Patent trolls invade the cloud
With the expansion of the cloud space, the move by leaders to focus on cloud for future company growth, and the shortfall of reform activity to restrict patent abuse, these trolls are making their next move: to cloud computing.
January 14, 2014 at 04:36 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
With the expansion of the cloud space, the move by leaders to focus on cloud for future company growth, and the shortfall of reform activity to restrict patent abuse, these trolls are making their next move: to cloud computing.
As patent trolls chase profits by pressuring companies to settle rather than fight the suits –a practice President Barack Obama has publicly likened to extortion – many are turning their attention to the cloud. As an emerging market full of complexity and potentially foggy technological definitions, cloud computing offers a huge opportunity for the hungry trolls.
So, why is the attack of the trolls on the cloud inevitable? According to Infoworld, first of all, cloud computing has deep roots in clustering, scientific computing, and data analysis — and those have been favored topics for universities. Universities often sell patent rights to trolls in order to make themselves feel better about their mistaken belief they can make their institutions rich by patenting research. Secondly, the cloud space has been slow to become profitable, and many startups have come and gone. The trolls lie in wait for these cheap spoils.
These days, a great deal of cloud computing relies on open source software, so the news from the Open Invention Network (OIN) that broke back in December — that Google would join and OIN would cover OpenStack – is no surprise. Consequently, it's likely that key cloud computing patents are in the hands of small patent trolls from both sources. Meanwhile, the big trolls have cloud computing business units and likely already have a patent arsenal. Problems like these inspired the creation of OIN nearly nine years ago.
Today, OIN regularly updates its Linux definitions — the list of packages that the licensee network agrees not to fight over with patents. Linux System is a comprehensive list, not just of the files comprising the Linux kernel, but also the files from the GNU Project, plus an expanding tally of applications and infrastructure hosted on top of GNU/Linux. You don't even have to run these applications on Linux to be eligible for protection; the packages themselves are protected. Thus, the patent pool has significant effects, due to the pool of patents owned by OIN and to the increasing community of licensees.
In 2012, there were a set of additions that led to OIN members Phillips and Sony limiting their involvement, and updates last year brought on the growing NoSQL database MongoDB to the definition, as well as much of the Android system and OpenJDK, the open source peer of Java. These recruits were serious enough to provoke Oracle into withdrawing. The actions by Oracle, Sony, and Phillips show that the OIN defenses are not just window dressing — they have real consequences.
The most recent updates added further growth packages — the new definition includes MariaDB, the popular variant of MySQL – as well as represented a significant move into protecting cloud computing. OIN has added the packages from OpenStack to the new definition, which comes into effect on March 6th.
Recently, state attorneys general from around the nation have been tackling the patent troll problem head on. To learn more about their efforts, join Vermont AG Bill Sorrell, Nebraska AG Jon Bruning and Missouri AG Chris Koster for a roundtable discussion on the patent troll problem. The roundtable takes place on Feb. 4 in New York City and will also feature general counsel from DuPont, Walmart and Rackspace. For more information or to sign up for the event, click here.
For more on patent trolls, check out these articles:
With the expansion of the cloud space, the move by leaders to focus on cloud for future company growth, and the shortfall of reform activity to restrict patent abuse, these trolls are making their next move: to cloud computing.
As patent trolls chase profits by pressuring companies to settle rather than fight the suits –a practice President Barack Obama has publicly likened to extortion – many are turning their attention to the cloud. As an emerging market full of complexity and potentially foggy technological definitions, cloud computing offers a huge opportunity for the hungry trolls.
So, why is the attack of the trolls on the cloud inevitable? According to Infoworld, first of all, cloud computing has deep roots in clustering, scientific computing, and data analysis — and those have been favored topics for universities. Universities often sell patent rights to trolls in order to make themselves feel better about their mistaken belief they can make their institutions rich by patenting research. Secondly, the cloud space has been slow to become profitable, and many startups have come and gone. The trolls lie in wait for these cheap spoils.
These days, a great deal of cloud computing relies on open source software, so the news from the Open Invention Network (OIN) that broke back in December — that
Today, OIN regularly updates its Linux definitions — the list of packages that the licensee network agrees not to fight over with patents. Linux System is a comprehensive list, not just of the files comprising the Linux kernel, but also the files from the GNU Project, plus an expanding tally of applications and infrastructure hosted on top of GNU/Linux. You don't even have to run these applications on Linux to be eligible for protection; the packages themselves are protected. Thus, the patent pool has significant effects, due to the pool of patents owned by OIN and to the increasing community of licensees.
In 2012, there were a set of additions that led to OIN members Phillips and Sony limiting their involvement, and updates last year brought on the growing NoSQL database MongoDB to the definition, as well as much of the Android system and OpenJDK, the open source peer of Java. These recruits were serious enough to provoke Oracle into withdrawing. The actions by Oracle, Sony, and Phillips show that the OIN defenses are not just window dressing — they have real consequences.
The most recent updates added further growth packages — the new definition includes MariaDB, the popular variant of MySQL – as well as represented a significant move into protecting cloud computing. OIN has added the packages from OpenStack to the new definition, which comes into effect on March 6th.
Recently, state attorneys general from around the nation have been tackling the patent troll problem head on. To learn more about their efforts, join Vermont AG Bill Sorrell, Nebraska AG Jon Bruning and Missouri AG Chris Koster for a roundtable discussion on the patent troll problem. The roundtable takes place on Feb. 4 in
For more on patent trolls, check out these articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250