SEC aggression to increase against compliance officers
The SEC will now seek to hold compliance officers personally reliable for their companies' failures in a newly aggressive change of tack.
January 15, 2014 at 03:30 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The changes that financial institutions underwent after the U.S. financial crisis and the Dodd-Frank legislation signed by President Barack Obama in 2010 had been unprecedented in modern times as significant regulation went into effect for banks and investment firms. And subsequent rulings have followed up on the regulatory mentality over financial institutions including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cracking down on compliance officers that work in hedge funds.
The Volcker Rule — an add-on to the Dodd-Frank legislation by President Obama in 2010 — required hedge funds of a certain size to register with the SEC and maintain chief compliance officers. The Wall Street Journal reports that the SEC will now seek to hold compliance officers personally reliable for their companies' failures in a newly aggressive change of tack.
The WSJ cites Marc Elovitz, a partner at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP in New York, as detailing the level of severity with which the SEC is about to hold compliance officers, despite there having been specific levels of accountability in past years:
“The SEC is being much more aggressive in charging compliance officers when there's a compliance failure. It puts the compliance officers in hedge funds in the hot seat and puts huge pressure on these firms and their officers to have much better compliance.”
While better compliance will likely always be a good thing, the new crackdown could cause worry for some compliance workers as the SEC's tactics have been to make examples of even small violations. SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White has been active in applying penalties to any in violation of SEC legislation — creating a culture of the most aggressive government financial regulation since the Great Depression. And compliance officers have no choice but to, well, comply.
Read more about the SEC here:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Lost 15 Asia Partners in a Year
- 2Spin-Off Firm Leaves Reed Smith Without Richmond Lobbying Practice
- 3DC's Birchstone Moore Combines With Chicago-Founded Wealth Planning Firm
- 4White Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
- 5Braverman Greenspun Acquires NY Real Estate Boutique
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250