Lower taxes + less regulation = a prosperous economy, says study
A recent study highlighting the international index of economic freedom states that the average amount of economic freedom is higher today than it has been in the past 20 years.
January 22, 2014 at 04:17 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A recent study highlighting the international index of economic freedom states that the average amount of economic freedom is higher today than it has been in the past 20 years. Organizations such as the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation in Washington have been measuring countries that implement fiscal restraint to help improve the state of the economy for their citizens for over two decades.
According to a Daily Advance report, those countries that have adopted fiscal restraint and free trade are recognized by earning high scores on the index for protecting the rights of contract and property ownership while avoiding excessive taxes or regulations. Needless to say, countries that abuse their power and do not adhere to practices to help improve the state of their economy earn low scores.
In the past 20 years, global poverty has experienced one of the largest declines in history due to hundreds of millions of people who live in countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asian that have liberalized their economies. It is up to each country's government to put policies and processes in place to consistently maintain or improve their financial state, however, that is not always the case, particularly with the standard of living increasing due to escalating oil and natural resources costs.
For the countries that do not display acts of fiscal restraint or are up against hardships that prevent them from stabilizing their economies, they remain repressed and are experiencing lower scores on the index than ever. Unfortunately after enduring one of the biggest economic declines in U.S. history, the United States has fallen out of the top 10 countries in economic freedom, according to the index.
So what can the U.S. do to regain its independence towards economic freedom? It's up to the state and local government to take charge to help reverse the downward trend. The first step is to curb our country's fiscal recklessness and to stabilize regulatory burdens that result in tax increases. Next is for the government to begin breaking down economic freedom a step further by state since evidence proves that jobs and businesses created at the state level help to further support economic growth.
In the report, John Hood referenced a 2012 paper in the International Journal of Economics and Finance that stated that higher economic freedom tends to attract higher levels of investment from foreign firms, which then leads to more economic growth. In addition, a 2007 study in the Southern Economic Journal found that states attract another form of valuable capital, people, to the extent they embrace economic freedom.
For related news on financial regulation and tax reform, check out these recent reports on Inside Counsel:
A recent study highlighting the international index of economic freedom states that the average amount of economic freedom is higher today than it has been in the past 20 years. Organizations such as the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation in Washington have been measuring countries that implement fiscal restraint to help improve the state of the economy for their citizens for over two decades.
According to a Daily Advance report, those countries that have adopted fiscal restraint and free trade are recognized by earning high scores on the index for protecting the rights of contract and property ownership while avoiding excessive taxes or regulations. Needless to say, countries that abuse their power and do not adhere to practices to help improve the state of their economy earn low scores.
In the past 20 years, global poverty has experienced one of the largest declines in history due to hundreds of millions of people who live in countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asian that have liberalized their economies. It is up to each country's government to put policies and processes in place to consistently maintain or improve their financial state, however, that is not always the case, particularly with the standard of living increasing due to escalating oil and natural resources costs.
For the countries that do not display acts of fiscal restraint or are up against hardships that prevent them from stabilizing their economies, they remain repressed and are experiencing lower scores on the index than ever. Unfortunately after enduring one of the biggest economic declines in U.S. history, the United States has fallen out of the top 10 countries in economic freedom, according to the index.
So what can the U.S. do to regain its independence towards economic freedom? It's up to the state and local government to take charge to help reverse the downward trend. The first step is to curb our country's fiscal recklessness and to stabilize regulatory burdens that result in tax increases. Next is for the government to begin breaking down economic freedom a step further by state since evidence proves that jobs and businesses created at the state level help to further support economic growth.
In the report, John Hood referenced a 2012 paper in the International Journal of Economics and Finance that stated that higher economic freedom tends to attract higher levels of investment from foreign firms, which then leads to more economic growth. In addition, a 2007 study in the Southern Economic Journal found that states attract another form of valuable capital, people, to the extent they embrace economic freedom.
For related news on financial regulation and tax reform, check out these recent reports on Inside Counsel:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250