Company behind oil spill files Chapter 11
The West Virginia company blamed for the massive leak that tainted water for hundreds of thousands of customers with has filed for bankruptcy, a move that will temporarily shield it from dozens of lawsuits.
January 29, 2014 at 05:11 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The West Virginia company blamed for the massive leak that tainted water for hundreds of thousands of customers with has filed for bankruptcy, a move that will temporarily shield it from dozens of lawsuits.
According to the Insurance Journal, the chemical spill occurred earlier this month, and so far, the company has not given any possible explanation for what caused leak.
The West Virginia Gazette reported that the Department of Environmental Protection has revealed that Freedom Industries claims that about 10,000 gallons leaked from the Charleston plant, up from an initial estimate of about 7,500 gallons.
Freedom Industries filed a Chapter 11 petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of West Virginia, eight days after the spill was discovered.
The spill itself has become front-and-center of the state's legislative session — Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin announced plans to push for regulation of above-ground storage tanks and to require contingency plans for water companies. Other lawmakers are proposing specific measures to regulate and inspect storage facilities.
Meanwhile, West Virginia's Congressional delegation, Sens. Jay Rockefeller and Joe Manchin, have introduced a bill requiring state inspections of above-ground chemical storage facilities, letting states recoup costs for emergency responses and setting industry standards for emergency responses.
While no cause has been listed for the massive spill, Freedom Industries Inc. also used its bankruptcy papers as a forum to “hypothesize” about what caused the spill, according to the Insurance Journal. The company's assets and liabilities are approximately between $1 million and $10 million. Freedom Industries has at least 200 creditors and owes its top 20 creditors $3.66.
The bankruptcy proceedings temporarily halt the lawsuits against Freedom Industries, Charleston attorney Anthony Majestro told Insurance Journal Magazine. Majestro represents several small businesses that sued the company. Majestro said his clients are “weighing an option” to petition the court to proceed in hopes of collecting on Freedom's insurance policy. It depends on the company's level of coverage, Majestro said.
A head of the local business group, Charleston Area Alliance, said he couldn't put a number on how much businesses had lost.
Despite the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, Washington, D.C., attorney and bankruptcy expert, H. Jason Gold, it will not preclude stall lawsuits against other parties targeted in the spill. According to the Insurance Journal, nor does the bankruptcy filing it frees Freedom Industries from its responsibility to rectify environmental damage caused by the spill, said Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Tom Aluise.
Mark E. Freedlander, an attorney with the law firm representing Freedom Industries, said in a statement that “the petition and related pleadings speak for themselves.”
Some of the lawsuits in Kanawha County Circuit Court against Freedom Industries also name West Virginia American Water Co. and Eastman Chemical, the producer of the coal-cleaning chemical that spilled. Freedom Industries also owes the Tennessee-based company $127,475, bankruptcy documents show.
In the documents, Freedom Industries also gives a possible explanation for what caused the chemical leak. The company said a nearby water line burst during recent frigid temperatures, the ground beneath a storage tank froze, and some kind of object punctured a hole in the tank's side, causing it to leak. The document says, “It is presently hypothesized” that this is what caused the leak.
The water was tainted after the chemical later leaked through a containment area at a facility owned by Freedom Industries. The water ran into the Elk River, contaminating the state's largest water system.
After the spill, residents in a nine-county area around the state capital of Charleston were told not to use the water for anything other than flushing toilets. Some businesses and schools were forced to close for several days.
Related stories:
The West
According to the Insurance Journal, the chemical spill occurred earlier this month, and so far, the company has not given any possible explanation for what caused leak.
The West
Freedom Industries filed a Chapter 11 petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of West
The spill itself has become front-and-center of the state's legislative session — Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin announced plans to push for regulation of above-ground storage tanks and to require contingency plans for water companies. Other lawmakers are proposing specific measures to regulate and inspect storage facilities.
Meanwhile, West
While no cause has been listed for the massive spill, Freedom Industries Inc. also used its bankruptcy papers as a forum to “hypothesize” about what caused the spill, according to the Insurance Journal. The company's assets and liabilities are approximately between $1 million and $10 million. Freedom Industries has at least 200 creditors and owes its top 20 creditors $3.66.
The bankruptcy proceedings temporarily halt the lawsuits against Freedom Industries, Charleston attorney Anthony Majestro told Insurance Journal Magazine. Majestro represents several small businesses that sued the company. Majestro said his clients are “weighing an option” to petition the court to proceed in hopes of collecting on Freedom's insurance policy. It depends on the company's level of coverage, Majestro said.
A head of the local business group, Charleston Area Alliance, said he couldn't put a number on how much businesses had lost.
Despite the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, Washington, D.C., attorney and bankruptcy expert, H. Jason Gold, it will not preclude stall lawsuits against other parties targeted in the spill. According to the Insurance Journal, nor does the bankruptcy filing it frees Freedom Industries from its responsibility to rectify environmental damage caused by the spill, said Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Tom Aluise.
Mark E. Freedlander, an attorney with the law firm representing Freedom Industries, said in a statement that “the petition and related pleadings speak for themselves.”
Some of the lawsuits in Kanawha County Circuit Court against Freedom Industries also name
In the documents, Freedom Industries also gives a possible explanation for what caused the chemical leak. The company said a nearby water line burst during recent frigid temperatures, the ground beneath a storage tank froze, and some kind of object punctured a hole in the tank's side, causing it to leak. The document says, “It is presently hypothesized” that this is what caused the leak.
The water was tainted after the chemical later leaked through a containment area at a facility owned by Freedom Industries. The water ran into the Elk River, contaminating the state's largest water system.
After the spill, residents in a nine-county area around the state capital of Charleston were told not to use the water for anything other than flushing toilets. Some businesses and schools were forced to close for several days.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250