JPMorgan agrees to settle on sex discrimination suit
A sex discrimination lawsuit has hit one of the U.S.'s largest banking firms in a rather humiliating stroke: JPMorgan Chase will shell out $1.5 million -- to be distributed among 16 women -- to settle charges of sexual discrimination.
February 05, 2014 at 04:38 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A sex discrimination lawsuit has hit one of the U.S.'s largest banking firms in a rather humiliating stroke: JPMorgan Chase will shell out $1.5 million — to be distributed among 16 women — to settle charges of sexual discrimination.
The women who filed the suit claimed that they were ostracized and taken off potentially lucrative sales calls as punishment for not embracing and engaging in sexually charged activity, according to CNN. And the U.S. EEOC has deemed the claim deserving of a court settlement. Instead of taking it to litigation, JPMorgan has agreed to settle.
The $1.5 million is chump change to the banking firm, but nonetheless significant as the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found the bank in the wrong in the case finally settled after it was brought to its floor in 2009. At the time, JPMorgan denied wrongdoing in the settlement.
Public response from JPMorgan has aligned with the EEOC's decision. Two spokespeople for JPMorgan have issued statements of behalf of the bank. Reuters reported that JPMorgan's spokesperson Amy Bonitatibus stated, “We fully agree with the EEOC that harassment and discrimination have no place in the work environment.”
And bank spokesman Jason Lobo stated, “We fully agree with the EEOC that such behavior should not be tolerated.”
The company's male employees associated with the lawsuit have been discharged.
As a result of the firm's settlement, the banking firm has agreed to more closely monitor how their employees are doled out lucrative sales calls in order to assure fair opportunity and access to lucrative sales deals.
Further reading:
A sex discrimination lawsuit has hit one of the U.S.'s largest banking firms in a rather humiliating stroke:
The women who filed the suit claimed that they were ostracized and taken off potentially lucrative sales calls as punishment for not embracing and engaging in sexually charged activity, according to CNN. And the U.S. EEOC has deemed the claim deserving of a court settlement. Instead of taking it to litigation, JPMorgan has agreed to settle.
The $1.5 million is chump change to the banking firm, but nonetheless significant as the U.S.
Public response from JPMorgan has aligned with the EEOC's decision. Two spokespeople for JPMorgan have issued statements of behalf of the bank. Reuters reported that JPMorgan's spokesperson Amy Bonitatibus stated, “We fully agree with the EEOC that harassment and discrimination have no place in the work environment.”
And bank spokesman Jason Lobo stated, “We fully agree with the EEOC that such behavior should not be tolerated.”
The company's male employees associated with the lawsuit have been discharged.
As a result of the firm's settlement, the banking firm has agreed to more closely monitor how their employees are doled out lucrative sales calls in order to assure fair opportunity and access to lucrative sales deals.
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readEx-Twitter Exec Sues for $20M, Says Musk Fired Her as 'Petty Retribution'
Policy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250