For-profit schools feeling legal pressure
Amaya and a group of former employees claim that school officials routinely misled students about job prospects and falsified school records to keep students enrolled.
February 20, 2014 at 05:57 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For-profit schools may be a growing trend in the education community, but one new lawsuit seeks to increase the scrutiny on for-profit schools that may be scamming their students.
Kelli J. Amaya, a former administrator at the for-profit Harris School of Business, has filed suit against Harris and its parent company, Premier Education Group, for fraud. Amaya and a group of former employees claim that school officials routinely misled students about job prospects and falsified school records to keep students enrolled in order to collect the more than $10,000 in tuition and grant money the school charged.
Amaya worked for Harris at two different school campuses between 2009 and 2011. In her time there, she told the New York Times in an interview, she saw a number of students that had no business being in school. Yet, she alleges, her superiors told her to push them through to graduation in any way possible.
“I saw students who never should have been there, students with whopping gaps in learning abilities and major psychiatric problems who were just not capable of doing the work,” Amaya said. “The bosses were always like, 'Stop asking why they're enrolled, just get them to graduation however you can.'”
The suit also claims that Harris routinely enrolled students into programs that they should not have been eligible for. In one case, a young student who had been convicted of a felony was training to be a pharmacy technician, even though the most widely used pharmacy technician certification excludes anyone with a felony or a drug offense. In another case, a student studying message therapy should have been excluded because of a prior sex crime.
This particular case isn't the only suit pending against Harris. In one New Jersey case, dozens of Harris students say the school lied about what professional certifications students would qualify for after completing the required coursework. Premier Education Group has also settled similar cases in the past, says the NYT.
For-profit schools are no new phenomenon to legal education experts. An October investigation by the Wall Street Journal found that for-profit law schools are on the rise, even as traditional law schools see decreasing class sizes.
The InfiLaw System, started by Chicago-based Sterling Partners in 2004, targets students whose GPAs or LSAT scores don't qualify them for admission with the top schools. But InfiLaw's bar passages and job placements are well below state averages, and InfiLaw has been subject to a number of suits from its own former students as well.
For the full New York Times story on Harris, click here.
And for more legal coverage of the education system, check out these recent stories:
For-profit schools may be a growing trend in the education community, but one new lawsuit seeks to increase the scrutiny on for-profit schools that may be scamming their students.
Kelli J. Amaya, a former administrator at the for-profit Harris School of Business, has filed suit against Harris and its parent company, Premier Education Group, for fraud. Amaya and a group of former employees claim that school officials routinely misled students about job prospects and falsified school records to keep students enrolled in order to collect the more than $10,000 in tuition and grant money the school charged.
Amaya worked for Harris at two different school campuses between 2009 and 2011. In her time there, she told the
“I saw students who never should have been there, students with whopping gaps in learning abilities and major psychiatric problems who were just not capable of doing the work,” Amaya said. “The bosses were always like, 'Stop asking why they're enrolled, just get them to graduation however you can.'”
The suit also claims that Harris routinely enrolled students into programs that they should not have been eligible for. In one case, a young student who had been convicted of a felony was training to be a pharmacy technician, even though the most widely used pharmacy technician certification excludes anyone with a felony or a drug offense. In another case, a student studying message therapy should have been excluded because of a prior sex crime.
This particular case isn't the only suit pending against Harris. In one New Jersey case, dozens of Harris students say the school lied about what professional certifications students would qualify for after completing the required coursework. Premier Education Group has also settled similar cases in the past, says the NYT.
For-profit schools are no new phenomenon to legal education experts. An October investigation by the Wall Street Journal found that for-profit law schools are on the rise, even as traditional law schools see decreasing class sizes.
The InfiLaw System, started by Chicago-based Sterling Partners in 2004, targets students whose GPAs or LSAT scores don't qualify them for admission with the top schools. But InfiLaw's bar passages and job placements are well below state averages, and InfiLaw has been subject to a number of suits from its own former students as well.
For the full
And for more legal coverage of the education system, check out these recent stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250