Lululemon rejects U.S. lawsuit’s allegation that it misled shareholders
Yoga-inspired athletic apparel company Lululemon Athletica Inc. says its year-long battle with bad publicity linked to slowing growth and a messy product recall did not reflect intent to defraud shareholders.
February 20, 2014 at 06:06 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Yoga-inspired athletic apparel company Lululemon Athletica Inc. says its year-long battle with bad publicity linked to slowing growth and a messy product recall did not reflect intent to defraud shareholders.
In a filing in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the Canadian retailer said it quickly addressed quality control problems, and updated investors in about the impact. It admits that comments by founder and Chairman Dennis “Chip” Wilson that some women's body shapes “just actually don't work” with Lululemon yoga pants created negative company press.
Additionally, shareholders accused Lululemon of hiding defects in its black luon pants, which were recalled; concealing its inability to address quality shortfalls; using deep discounting to boost market share, and concealing plans to replace Christine Day as CEO.
“While all of this makes for interesting reading,” the company said in a statement, “it does not constitute securities fraud.”
Now, Lululemon is seeking to dismiss an amended lawsuit accusing it of misleading shareholders from September 7, 2012 to 10, 2014- just before shares of the company fell to a two-year low.
Just last month Day was, in fact, replaced as CEO by former TOMS Shoes president Laurent Potdevin. In addition, Wilson is stepping down this year as non-executive chairman. Wilson said he had last held a management role at Lululemon in January 2012, and that allegations that he “dipped in and out of daily affairs” did not show he knew about any fraud.
Admitting 2013 was a tough year after the second low earnings forecast, CFO John Currie called this “a real wake-up call.”
While we believe much of 2013 for Lululemon can be best described as self-inflicted pain, it is still likely to outperform the vast majority of retail in 2013.
Sharon Zackfia, Partner and Group Head-Consumer at William Blair & Company, L.L.C, said, “There will be a 4 percent brick-and-mortar comp gain and an approximate 10 percent comp gain including e-commerce. With some encouraging early data points on customer reception of spring product, we see the potential for comps to begin improving as early as the first quarter and view the stock as a compelling risk/reward opportunity from current levels of 22 times our 2014 estimate.”
For more on defraud, check out these articles:
Yoga-inspired athletic apparel company Lululemon Athletica Inc. says its year-long battle with bad publicity linked to slowing growth and a messy product recall did not reflect intent to defraud shareholders.
In a filing in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the Canadian retailer said it quickly addressed quality control problems, and updated investors in about the impact. It admits that comments by founder and Chairman Dennis “Chip” Wilson that some women's body shapes “just actually don't work” with Lululemon yoga pants created negative company press.
Additionally, shareholders accused Lululemon of hiding defects in its black luon pants, which were recalled; concealing its inability to address quality shortfalls; using deep discounting to boost market share, and concealing plans to replace Christine Day as CEO.
“While all of this makes for interesting reading,” the company said in a statement, “it does not constitute securities fraud.”
Now, Lululemon is seeking to dismiss an amended lawsuit accusing it of misleading shareholders from September 7, 2012 to 10, 2014- just before shares of the company fell to a two-year low.
Just last month Day was, in fact, replaced as CEO by former TOMS Shoes president Laurent Potdevin. In addition, Wilson is stepping down this year as non-executive chairman. Wilson said he had last held a management role at Lululemon in January 2012, and that allegations that he “dipped in and out of daily affairs” did not show he knew about any fraud.
Admitting 2013 was a tough year after the second low earnings forecast, CFO John Currie called this “a real wake-up call.”
While we believe much of 2013 for Lululemon can be best described as self-inflicted pain, it is still likely to outperform the vast majority of retail in 2013.
Sharon Zackfia, Partner and Group Head-Consumer at
For more on defraud, check out these articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250