5 notable GCs in the news
General counsel sound off on cross-licensing agreements, career advancement and more
February 21, 2014 at 05:51 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
“As an industry pioneer in smartphones with a strong patent portfolio, HTC is pleased to come to this agreement, which will enable us to stay focused on innovation for consumers.”
- Grace Lei, general counsel of HTC
Cross-licensing has become all the rage in technology circles recently, most notably with Google, Samsung and Cisco completing a trio of deals that has the three companies cross-licensing patents for the next 10 years. Not to be outdone, however, technology giants HTC and Nokia agreed to a cross-licensing deal of their own, hoping to join forces to increase their own respective market shares. Through the terms of the deal, all pending IP litigation between the companies is considered settled. In addition, according to a release, HTC will make payments to Nokia and will grant it access to its portfolio of LTE patents.
“We needed to do something that was exceptional. You can go to a lot of great places in Florida. We needed to do exceptional, not just great.”
- Rich Mack, general counsel of Mosaic
Let's play a game. Say you're on the board at Mosaic, one of the world's largest phosphate companies. Once one of your mines runs dry in the 1960s, you're suddenly left with 15 million cubic yards of sand. Do you simply let it become your own personal desert? Or, do you do as Mosaic did, and make a resort with a modern hotel, two award-winning golf courses, and a spa? The Record of Central Florida explored the property, which has become an unlikely source of pride for the company since opening in late 2012. Mack, an avid golfer himself, says that golf course gurus were initially skeptical that the company would be able to pull off its goals. “They expected Central Florida to be relatively flat,” he said.
“I'm proud that we stepped up for our customers. But, that expenditure would not have been necessary if Innovatio had met its obligations to license on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, and had come to Cisco seeking a reasonable license first rather than targeting our customers and those of other manufacturers.”
- Mark Chandler, general counsel of Cisco
Patent trolling may be on the rise, but so too are the number of technology companies willing to fight back against them. One of the most notable names in this fight is Innovatio IP Ventures, which purchased old Broadcom patents related to Wi-Fi technology, then went on the offensive with multiple IP infringement suits against companies that used Wi-Fi technology. One of those suits was against Cisco, but despite Cisco officials claiming that Innovatio originally request $4 billion to settle, the two sides eventually settled the case for $2.7 million. That figure amounts to just 3.2 cents per Cisco wireless device, which Chandler called a “victory” for customers.
“We don't have many folks there. For us to supplant those people, it doesn't make much sense.”
- Kevin Reid, general counsel of Ruger
As supply chain management remains a top of mind risk for many in-house legal teams and C-suites, a natural progression leads leaders to wonder whether a company's manufacturing is located in the most efficient place. For gun-maker Ruger, efficiency means holding manufacturing locations in gun-friendly areas such as Prescott, Ariz., Newport, N.H., and Mayodan, N.C. However, Reid says he doesn't see the company headquarters in Southport, Conn., going away any time soon. Even though manufacturing is based in gun-friendly areas of the country, the business side does not necessarily have to be.
“I don't think people always should necessarily aspire to be a GC—there are strengths and weaknesses to all positions—but if that's your goal, you should have a realistic eye around whether the business and people around you are going to wind up making that happen.”
- Janet Langford Kelly, general counsel of ConocoPhillips
In nearly 20 years in-house, including jobs at the top of the legal ladder with Sara Lee Corp., the Kellogg Company, and ConocoPhillips, Janet Langford Kelly has seen her fair share of in-house attorneys rise through the ranks. She doesn't believe that everyone wants to rise up to her top level, but if you do, she says, make sure that you're someone that people want to help. “The most valuable lesson I learned outside is how to manage relationships where you're not in charge,” Kelly said in the February issue of InsideCounsel magazine. “It helps to be a collegial person that people want to help. If you call at 10 p.m., people are more likely to pick up the phone for someone they like.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250