Boston corporations demand changes in law firm billing
Lately, the balance of power has shifted from large law firms to corporate clients, who are using bargaining power to demand lower fees and flexibility in pricing models.
March 04, 2014 at 05:04 AM
12 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lately, the balance of power has shifted from large law firms to corporate clients, who are using bargaining power to demand lower fees and flexibility in pricing models. As a result, many firms are doing what once seemed unthinkable in the industry: cutting hourly rates, bidding for corporate work against rival firms, capping prices, and staying focused on the client's bottom line.
This change has led to the firms cutting their own costs in a drive to become more efficient, using fewer attorneys on cases, and moving back-office operations to lower cost states. “They're more and more attacking the old hourly fee structure,” Joel Carpenter, managing partner at the Boston firm Sullivan & Worcester LLP, told The Boston Globe.
Among the smaller firms, Sullivan & Worcester, which has 175 attorneys, is benefiting from the changing environment by undercutting the prices of large firms. The smaller players are agreeing to hourly fees that are sometimes 25 percent less than what top-tier firms might charge and, at the request of corporate clients, holding down costs by not assigning as many firm personnel to work on cases. This has allowed smaller firms to acquire more corporate business, grow revenue, as well as the number of attorneys at their firms.
In 2006, Nelson Mullins LLP opened a Boston office with just two attorneys, but started with a competitive advantage of administrative, technology, and other back-office operations are located at its headquarters in low cost South Carolina. Now, its Boston office has 60 lawyers, due to aggressive recruiting, a merger four years ago with a small local firm, and winning corporate business by offering quality legal work at lower prices.
According to Peter Haley, managing partner of the Boston office of Nelson Mullins, “We're trying to become more client centric, not lawyer centric.”
Robert Novick, a co-managing partner at WilmerHale, said his firm has heard the calls for change. WilmerHale has started agreeing to fixed prices for some legal services, but has also taken other steps to cut costs. Four years ago, for example, it opened a “business center” in Dayton, Ohio, where the cost of living is about a third less than in major Northeast cities. The firm now employs nearly 250 back-office workers there.
“No one can allow themselves the luxury of not being more competitive these days,” Novick told The Boston Globe. “The client community is trying to be as fiscally responsible as they can, and we in the legal industry and at WilmerHale have reacted to that.”
Law firms also are facing the same forces that have driven other industries to become leaner and meaner, namely globalization and technology. The recent recession has added additional pressures – they've driven profit-conscious corporations to find ways to cut legal bills, which can cost companies tens of millions of dollars per year, and have accelerated the shift among law firms towards more efficient, lower cost business models.
“The business has had to change,” said Joseph Ryan, chief executive at Brown Rudnick LLP. “Because clients are more cost conscious, we're spending more and more time [pitching to clients] and answering their requests for proposals.”
For more news on law firms, check out these articles:
Lately, the balance of power has shifted from large law firms to corporate clients, who are using bargaining power to demand lower fees and flexibility in pricing models. As a result, many firms are doing what once seemed unthinkable in the industry: cutting hourly rates, bidding for corporate work against rival firms, capping prices, and staying focused on the client's bottom line.
This change has led to the firms cutting their own costs in a drive to become more efficient, using fewer attorneys on cases, and moving back-office operations to lower cost states. “They're more and more attacking the old hourly fee structure,” Joel Carpenter, managing partner at the Boston firm
Among the smaller firms,
In 2006,
According to Peter Haley, managing partner of the Boston office of
Robert Novick, a co-managing partner at WilmerHale, said his firm has heard the calls for change. WilmerHale has started agreeing to fixed prices for some legal services, but has also taken other steps to cut costs. Four years ago, for example, it opened a “business center” in Dayton, Ohio, where the cost of living is about a third less than in major Northeast cities. The firm now employs nearly 250 back-office workers there.
“No one can allow themselves the luxury of not being more competitive these days,” Novick told The Boston Globe. “The client community is trying to be as fiscally responsible as they can, and we in the legal industry and at WilmerHale have reacted to that.”
Law firms also are facing the same forces that have driven other industries to become leaner and meaner, namely globalization and technology. The recent recession has added additional pressures – they've driven profit-conscious corporations to find ways to cut legal bills, which can cost companies tens of millions of dollars per year, and have accelerated the shift among law firms towards more efficient, lower cost business models.
“The business has had to change,” said Joseph Ryan, chief executive at
For more news on law firms, check out these articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250