Keurig under fire for use of DRM in new coffee makers
Keurig will deliberately use digital rights management (DRM) in its new coffee brewers to lock out third-party pods in a move that effectively enables Keurig to maintain a monopoly over the cups used in Keurigs brewers.
March 04, 2014 at 04:55 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Keurig, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, manufactures single-brew coffee makers which have escalated in popularity over the past several years as the single-brew market took off in the U.S. Other home-brewing manufacturers have climbed the top the market, but Keurig has maintained a solid dominant position in the single-cup space. One of its competitors — TreeHouse Foods — is now suing the single-cup brewing manufacturer for antitrust and anticompetitive practices that involve its sales of coffee refill pods.
Keurig will deliberately use digital rights management (DRM) in its new coffee brewers to lock out third-party pods in a move that — as Treehouse Foods claims — effectively enables Keurig to maintain a monopoly over the cups used in Keurig's brewers. The source of this argument stems from the sales of refill pods by third-party suppliers — essentially suppliers who are not also manufacturing coffee brewers like Keurig. Some third-party pod suppliers sell their pods for less than what Keurig does — a trend that Keurig now seeks to stem by striking exclusionary agreements with third parties to lock them out of the market.
The complaint, filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, aims at pegging Keurig for violating antitrust laws and unfair competition statutes in three states. TreeHouse Foods also intends to highlight, according to SlashGear, that Keurig is using DRM in its new brewers to lock out third-party pod suppliers. Keurig's new single-cup coffee machines will include technology that will enable only Keurig pods to be used with it — effectively disabling Keurig users from being able to purchase any coffee refill pods from any vendor other than Keurig.
Keurig claims that its new technology will ensure better quality for its customers — something TreeHouse Foods claims has no merit for customers. SlashGear quoted Brian Kelley, CEO of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters:
”To ensure the system delivers on the promise of excellent quality beverages produced simply and consistently every brew every time, we use interactive technology to help us perfectly brew all Keurig brew packs. Because of this, the system will not brew unlicensed packs.”
The single-cup market is steadily on the rise in the U.S. too, making this lawsuit of vital importance to the market players moving forward. Recent research from Mintel Group describes the popularity of single-cup coffee makers as having injured the roasted coffee market over the last several years. Since sales of single-cup makers and byproducts have skyrocketed, roasted coffee has declined, and will continue to decline having been eroded by the single-cup market.
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOpenAI Hires First Compliance Chief, Snagging Uber's Scott Schools
Meta Hit With Class Action for Allegedly Using Pirated Books to Train AI Models
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250