SEC staffer near deferred prosecution agreement in stock case
Deferred prosecution agreements are often approved for major corporations, but rarely are DPAs approved for individuals.
March 04, 2014 at 06:23 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) aren't only for businesses, as U.S. prosecutors have entered into a DPA with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staffer accused of unlawfully holding stocks and lying about his portfolio in court.
Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's office announced in a late February court filing that it has reached a potential DPA with SEC staffer Steven Gilchrist pending a probation office investigation. The court filing did not give any indication of the nature of the DPA, other than to request a delay in proceedings.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the New York-based Gilchrist was charged with three counts of making false statements regarding his financial holdings. He claimed that all of his stock holdings were in alignment with the SEC's employee rules, but in actuality, he held shares of six companies that SEC staffers are barred from holding.
Deferred prosecution agreements are often approved for major corporations — such as HBSC's agreement with the U.S. government last August — but rarely are DPAs approved for individuals.
DPAs also carry with them some risk if in-house counsel are not careful. As Valecia McDowell, John Fagg, and Kimberly Cochran wrote in a June 2012 InsideCounsel column, some parties that enter into the agreements “find themselves forced to waive the attorney-client privilege, restructure their business, turn over work attorney product, pay hefty fines and carry out an array of other stipulations required by the prosecutor or enforcement division of a regulating agency.”
The authors also wrote that the public perception of DPAs offering a financial benefit is misconceived. Even after entering a DPA, many parties still have paid fines of hundreds of millions of dollars related to misconduct.
For more on white collar defense, check out these recent articles:
Supreme Court Gabelli decision will continue to bring changes to SEC enforcement policy
Beanie Babies billionaire secretly withheld bank records from grand jury
Former Madoff aide testifies in own trial
Former Barclays traders face criminal charges for Libor manipulation
Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) aren't only for businesses, as U.S. prosecutors have entered into a DPA with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staffer accused of unlawfully holding stocks and lying about his portfolio in court.
Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's office announced in a late February court filing that it has reached a potential DPA with SEC staffer Steven Gilchrist pending a probation office investigation. The court filing did not give any indication of the nature of the DPA, other than to request a delay in proceedings.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the New York-based Gilchrist was charged with three counts of making false statements regarding his financial holdings. He claimed that all of his stock holdings were in alignment with the SEC's employee rules, but in actuality, he held shares of six companies that SEC staffers are barred from holding.
Deferred prosecution agreements are often approved for major corporations — such as HBSC's agreement with the U.S. government last August — but rarely are DPAs approved for individuals.
DPAs also carry with them some risk if in-house counsel are not careful. As Valecia McDowell, John Fagg, and Kimberly Cochran wrote in a June 2012 InsideCounsel column, some parties that enter into the agreements “find themselves forced to waive the attorney-client privilege, restructure their business, turn over work attorney product, pay hefty fines and carry out an array of other stipulations required by the prosecutor or enforcement division of a regulating agency.”
The authors also wrote that the public perception of DPAs offering a financial benefit is misconceived. Even after entering a DPA, many parties still have paid fines of hundreds of millions of dollars related to misconduct.
For more on white collar defense, check out these recent articles:
Supreme Court Gabelli decision will continue to bring changes to SEC enforcement policy
Beanie Babies billionaire secretly withheld bank records from grand jury
Former Madoff aide testifies in own trial
Former
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250