Comcast/Time Warner merger now facing scrutiny from states
Florida announced that it would join the Department of Justice in vetting whether or not the Comcast/TWC merger is legal under antitrust regulations.
March 20, 2014 at 07:46 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Maybe it's the fact that together they'd own a third of the nation's broadband infrastructure, or that it would mean one less cable provider option for customers, or that both parties involved have been nominated for the “Worst Company in America 2014” award , but for whatever reason, the proposed merger of the cable heavyweights Time Warner Cable and Comcast has plenty of opponents and is expected to receive considerable scrutiny from regulatory agencies.
Now in addition to federal agencies, states are lining up to run the proposed deal through the ringer.
On Mar. 19, Florida announced that it would join the Department of Justice in vetting whether or not the Comcast/TWC merger is legal under antitrust regulations. The Florida attorney general's office said in an email to Reuters that, “”We are part of a multistate group reviewing the proposed transaction along with the U.S. DOJ Antitrust Division.”
Indiana similarly issued a statement that it would investigate the impact of the deal on its citizens, and Pennsylvania also announced its intention to launch a review into the case.
Comcast and TWC contend that because they do not have territory overlap that the merger would not technically reduce the number of competitors in any single area. But for consumer advocates who are already displeased with the number of service providers, nationwide the conglomeration raises concerns regardless.
One person certainly vested in the swift and clean finalization of the deal is sitting Time Warner CEO Rob Marcus, who stands to make a $79.9 million severance payment as a golden parachute for agreeing to the Comcast buy out.
For more on the deal, and cable infrastructure check out these stories:
Maybe it's the fact that together they'd own a third of the nation's broadband infrastructure, or that it would mean one less cable provider option for customers, or that both parties involved have been nominated for the “Worst Company in America 2014” award , but for whatever reason, the proposed merger of the cable heavyweights
Now in addition to federal agencies, states are lining up to run the proposed deal through the ringer.
On Mar. 19, Florida announced that it would join the Department of Justice in vetting whether or not the
Indiana similarly issued a statement that it would investigate the impact of the deal on its citizens, and Pennsylvania also announced its intention to launch a review into the case.
One person certainly vested in the swift and clean finalization of the deal is sitting Time Warner CEO Rob Marcus, who stands to make a $79.9 million severance payment as a golden parachute for agreeing to the
For more on the deal, and cable infrastructure check out these stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
Trending Stories
- 1Wilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
- 2Pass Rate on California's July 2024 Bar Exam Ticks Up to 53.8%
- 3High Court Asked To Review DOJ's 'Illusory Promise,' Religious Charter School, Meta Class Action
- 4'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
- 5$5.5M Miami Verdict: Meet the Lawyers Behind the Slip-and-Fall Suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250