Three charged with stealing inside information from M&A firm Simpson Thatcher
Three men netted $5.6 million by trading on inside information that included knowledge of Tyco Internationals plans to buy Brinks Home Security Holdings and OfficeMaxs plans to merge with Office Depot.
March 20, 2014 at 08:15 AM
11 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Corporate data breaches typically occur within a company's own computers, but a new case out of New York signals a new area of entry for potential thieves — the company's outside law partners.
Prosecutors say that three men ran an insider-trading ring using information illegally taken from mergers and acquisition firm Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett LLP. According to a criminal complaint, the three men netted $5.6 million by trading on inside information that included knowledge of Tyco International's plans to buy Brink's Home Security Holdings and OfficeMax's plans to merge with Office Depot.
Steven Metro, formerly a managing clerk at Simpson Thatcher, used the firm's computer system for information that he could steal. He then passed the information on to broker-dealer Vladimir Eydelman who traded on the information. A third unnamed man also traded on the information; he is cooperating with investigators in exchange for a plea deal.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Metro plans to plead not guilty, with one of lawyers saying, “These are only allegations. Eydelman has not commented on the criminal complaint.
Simpson Thatcher claims that it did not know about the scheme until March 19, when Metro and Eydelman first appeared in court. The firm promptly terminated Metro's employment.
In an Internet-based world, securing trade secrets has become even more difficult. While a corporation could host the best privacy standards possible, in-house counsel should also make sure that outside counsel are also held up to the same standard.
One of the keys to ensuring trade secrets, says David Carns of @Legal Discovery, is stepping up internal controls, even encrypting documents and devices to make sure they don't fall into the wrong hands. “Even if the device is lost or forgotten, if the device's contents are encrypted, it will be impossible for third parties to read the encrypted data,” Carns said. “Using common techniques, such device encryption, can be enforced even on BYOD devices.”
For more on the fallout from recent corporate data breaches, check out these InsideCounsel articles:
Treasury Department undersecretary says bitcoin regulation fine for now
Privacy, data and different jurisdictions: How legal approaches differ between the U.S. and EU
Charges filed in cybercrime ring that hit 14 different financial institutions
Target's cybersecurity event may have been preventable
Corporate data breaches typically occur within a company's own computers, but a new case out of
Prosecutors say that three men ran an insider-trading ring using information illegally taken from mergers and acquisition firm
Steven Metro, formerly a managing clerk at
According to the Wall Street Journal, Metro plans to plead not guilty, with one of lawyers saying, “These are only allegations. Eydelman has not commented on the criminal complaint.
In an Internet-based world, securing trade secrets has become even more difficult. While a corporation could host the best privacy standards possible, in-house counsel should also make sure that outside counsel are also held up to the same standard.
One of the keys to ensuring trade secrets, says David Carns of @Legal Discovery, is stepping up internal controls, even encrypting documents and devices to make sure they don't fall into the wrong hands. “Even if the device is lost or forgotten, if the device's contents are encrypted, it will be impossible for third parties to read the encrypted data,” Carns said. “Using common techniques, such device encryption, can be enforced even on BYOD devices.”
For more on the fallout from recent corporate data breaches, check out these InsideCounsel articles:
Treasury Department undersecretary says bitcoin regulation fine for now
Privacy, data and different jurisdictions: How legal approaches differ between the U.S. and EU
Charges filed in cybercrime ring that hit 14 different financial institutions
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1On The Move: Energy Infrastructure Pro Joins Moore & Van Allen, Adams & Reese Changes Atlanta Leadership
- 2Miami Attorneys Secure $4M Settlement Despite Insurance Limits
- 3NY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
- 4Legaltech Rundown: Alexi Launches an AI Litigation Tool, Hotshot Announces Private Equity Practice Courses, and More
- 56-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250