The benefits of matter management systems for corporate counsel
Keeping track of activities, outside counsel, legal spend and documents for legal matters used to be a manual process. Today, however, matter management technology enables the process to be centralized and systematic.
March 21, 2014 at 04:00 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The reality of corporate life is that litigation and legal transactions are always present. Nearly every business transaction requires legal review, and often assistance, from outside counsel. Once litigation becomes imminent, tracking how much money is being spent and which outside resources are being used become important and difficult tasks to manage. Modern matter management technology has made the chore of managing corporate legal matters far more effective and efficient. This article will review the benefits of matter management systems and how they can be effective in your legal department.
Matter tracking
Simply keeping track of active matters and who is working on them can be a complicated task. Matter management software provides a centralized approach to tracking which matters are in play and which resources are being used. Far beyond simple spreadsheets and word processing documents, matter management tools will help you keep track of all matters and their associated details. For example, if you have a litigation portfolio of 30 matters, modern matter management software will help you track how long each matter has been active, at which stage within litigation each matter lies, and which outside firms are assisting. Since these tools are centralized and accessible to appropriate individuals on your team, it is easy to stay organized and allow the proper employees access to the information.
Budgeting and billing
Many matter management tools will also help you keep track of your budget for each matter. You can track document review costs, attorney time, vendor disbursements and any other line items in your invoices. You can set hard thresholds, track your legal spend more effectively and even set alerts for when thresholds are exceeded. With integration into e-billing modules, you can efficiently track which types of time entries and tasks are being billed to your matters.
Many systems have invoice validation rules which can verify that your outside counsel invoices adhere to your corporate rules. Do you have limits on associate billing rates and paralegal overtime charges? Invoice validation will flag invoices with violations to those limits. Are disbursements such as fax charges and photocopies negotiated out of your outside counsel fees? Invoice validation will ensure compliance. The budgeting and billing capabilities in matter management software make what was once a manual task an undertaking which can be implemented with relative ease.
Document management
Keeping track of all documents relating to a matter is often best handled with a centralized platform. You may already have a document management system within your organization, but utilizing document management software which is directly integrated into your matter management software will allow you to search for documents more easily by matter name or litigation type. In addition, it is convenient to have access to all engagement letters, court filings and corporate agreements in a single location. The document management capabilities in your matter management software can enforce security rights on sensitive documents and also provide an audit trail of who accessed which documents and when.
Reporting
Reporting is one of the best features with any matter management system, but its benefits do not become apparent until you have used the system for a while. You need to have a certain critical mass of information before such reports show their true value. For example, are you curious about how many matters you have with outside counsel from Chicago versus New York? Matter management reporting can let you know. Curious about which regions in the country have the best billing rates for IP partners? Matter management reporting can tell you. The important thing is to capture as much data as possible, throughout the lifecycle of each matter, in order to make the best use of reporting.
Beyond internal metrics, reporting systems also allow you to report matter-level detail to other interested parties in the organization. You can provide summary reports of all legal matters in your portfolio to the CEO's or CFO's office, along with detailed legal spend information, on a per matter basis.
Conclusion
Keeping track of activities, outside counsel, legal spend and documents for legal matters used to be a manual process. Today, however, matter management technology enables the process to be centralized and systematic. As you input more data about each matter, you will find that better quality information will be produced about your portfolio, empowering you to make the best use of both corporate and outside counsel resources.
The reality of corporate life is that litigation and legal transactions are always present. Nearly every business transaction requires legal review, and often assistance, from outside counsel. Once litigation becomes imminent, tracking how much money is being spent and which outside resources are being used become important and difficult tasks to manage. Modern matter management technology has made the chore of managing corporate legal matters far more effective and efficient. This article will review the benefits of matter management systems and how they can be effective in your legal department.
Matter tracking
Simply keeping track of active matters and who is working on them can be a complicated task. Matter management software provides a centralized approach to tracking which matters are in play and which resources are being used. Far beyond simple spreadsheets and word processing documents, matter management tools will help you keep track of all matters and their associated details. For example, if you have a litigation portfolio of 30 matters, modern matter management software will help you track how long each matter has been active, at which stage within litigation each matter lies, and which outside firms are assisting. Since these tools are centralized and accessible to appropriate individuals on your team, it is easy to stay organized and allow the proper employees access to the information.
Budgeting and billing
Many matter management tools will also help you keep track of your budget for each matter. You can track document review costs, attorney time, vendor disbursements and any other line items in your invoices. You can set hard thresholds, track your legal spend more effectively and even set alerts for when thresholds are exceeded. With integration into e-billing modules, you can efficiently track which types of time entries and tasks are being billed to your matters.
Many systems have invoice validation rules which can verify that your outside counsel invoices adhere to your corporate rules. Do you have limits on associate billing rates and paralegal overtime charges? Invoice validation will flag invoices with violations to those limits. Are disbursements such as fax charges and photocopies negotiated out of your outside counsel fees? Invoice validation will ensure compliance. The budgeting and billing capabilities in matter management software make what was once a manual task an undertaking which can be implemented with relative ease.
Document management
Keeping track of all documents relating to a matter is often best handled with a centralized platform. You may already have a document management system within your organization, but utilizing document management software which is directly integrated into your matter management software will allow you to search for documents more easily by matter name or litigation type. In addition, it is convenient to have access to all engagement letters, court filings and corporate agreements in a single location. The document management capabilities in your matter management software can enforce security rights on sensitive documents and also provide an audit trail of who accessed which documents and when.
Reporting
Reporting is one of the best features with any matter management system, but its benefits do not become apparent until you have used the system for a while. You need to have a certain critical mass of information before such reports show their true value. For example, are you curious about how many matters you have with outside counsel from Chicago versus
Beyond internal metrics, reporting systems also allow you to report matter-level detail to other interested parties in the organization. You can provide summary reports of all legal matters in your portfolio to the CEO's or CFO's office, along with detailed legal spend information, on a per matter basis.
Conclusion
Keeping track of activities, outside counsel, legal spend and documents for legal matters used to be a manual process. Today, however, matter management technology enables the process to be centralized and systematic. As you input more data about each matter, you will find that better quality information will be produced about your portfolio, empowering you to make the best use of both corporate and outside counsel resources.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250