Indiana water company cited for overpaying executives
The Citizens Energy Group in Indiana has been cited by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission for overpaying its executives, and the Commission has launched a probe into the utility companys business management practices.
March 24, 2014 at 05:27 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Citizens Energy Group in Indiana has been cited by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission for overpaying its executives, and the Commission has launched a probe into the utility company's business management practices.
According to the Indy Star, Citizens CEO Carey Lykins was in an unsavory spotlight in 2013 for his reported 2012 salary of $2.9 million, which was almost double his 2011 salary. Utility regulators summoned him to a public hearing to justify his salary, which he did, claiming it is a normal rate when compared to other utility executives. Regulators found his claims to be unfounded, and have since begun investigations into how Citizens Energy charges consumers and how it doles out executive pay.
The IURC thus far has reduced the amount the company can raise rates on its customers until its billing practices and customer services have been thoroughly probed. The excuse given for raising rates on citizens was the aging structure of the Indianapolis water system and the costs that Citizens Energy put out in order to bring the system back up to snuff. The issue at hand for the IURC is whether or not the rates went up exorbitantly, only to fill the pockets of the utility company's executives, rather than wholly going to the improvement of the water system. Citizens Energy has issued backlash on the IURC's stemming of its rate increases, claiming that lower rates will result in a poor infrastructure
The Star notes that one in four customers hangs up before receiving help with Citizens Energy, and quotes Indianapolis' Mayor Greg Ballard on the subject, who leaves the issue in the hands of the IURC: “Rates were always destined to go up, because of the aging infrastructure and the need to replace that…But they were going up much less because of Citizens' management than they would have otherwise.”
The IURC will have to determine whether or not Citizens Energy's increased payrolls were a matter of business expansion, or if they were raised unfairly and have put unnecessary costs on customers.
Further reading:
The Citizens Energy Group in Indiana has been cited by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission for overpaying its executives, and the Commission has launched a probe into the utility company's business management practices.
According to the Indy Star, Citizens CEO Carey Lykins was in an unsavory spotlight in 2013 for his reported 2012 salary of $2.9 million, which was almost double his 2011 salary. Utility regulators summoned him to a public hearing to justify his salary, which he did, claiming it is a normal rate when compared to other utility executives. Regulators found his claims to be unfounded, and have since begun investigations into how Citizens Energy charges consumers and how it doles out executive pay.
The IURC thus far has reduced the amount the company can raise rates on its customers until its billing practices and customer services have been thoroughly probed. The excuse given for raising rates on citizens was the aging structure of the Indianapolis water system and the costs that Citizens Energy put out in order to bring the system back up to snuff. The issue at hand for the IURC is whether or not the rates went up exorbitantly, only to fill the pockets of the utility company's executives, rather than wholly going to the improvement of the water system. Citizens Energy has issued backlash on the IURC's stemming of its rate increases, claiming that lower rates will result in a poor infrastructure
The Star notes that one in four customers hangs up before receiving help with Citizens Energy, and quotes Indianapolis' Mayor Greg Ballard on the subject, who leaves the issue in the hands of the IURC: “Rates were always destined to go up, because of the aging infrastructure and the need to replace that…But they were going up much less because of Citizens' management than they would have otherwise.”
The IURC will have to determine whether or not Citizens Energy's increased payrolls were a matter of business expansion, or if they were raised unfairly and have put unnecessary costs on customers.
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250