Madoff jury deliberates after star witness is called on to testify
The trail of five ex-employees of Bernard Madoff continued as the judge called a recess for the jurors to review the testimony of star prosecution witness Frank DiPascali
March 24, 2014 at 05:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The ongoing case against five former employees of Bernard Madoff continued this past week as the judge called a recess for the jurors to review the testimony of star prosecution witness Frank DiPascali.
According to USA Today, the panel of jurors made up of nine women and three men made the request to deliberate after several hours of consideration. This proceeding is the first Madoff-related case to be weighed by a jury.
A former stockbroker, investment advisor and financier, Madoff admitted to his operation in the Ponzi scheme, which is considered to be the largest financial fraud in the US. Madoff stole an estimated $20 billion from thousands of investors and pleaded guilty without standing trial in December 2008. He is now serving a 150-year prison term. If found guilty, the ex-employees face decades behind bars for knowingly participating and profiting from Madoff's fraud.
The USA report states that the jurors requested testimonies for former Madoff operations manager Daniel Bonventre, as well as by Enrica Cotellessa-Pitz, who like DiPascali pleaded guilty in the massive Ponzi scheme and testified against their former co-workers. The other defendants include Annette Bongiorno, who handled the financier's top clients, JoAnn Crupi, who oversaw the company's bank account, and former Madoff computer programmers Jerome O'Hara and George Perez.
All of the employees pleaded innocent and insisted throughout the trial that they were unwittingly tricked into performing job assignments that enabled the scam to operate for decades, according to the report.
The heart of the case for both sides was the relative credibility of DiPascali, who was a manager of the disgraced financier's investment advisory division in Manhattan. During weeks on the witness stand, DiPascali testified that Madoff never carried out the financial trading promised to investors and specifically linked each defendant to the fraud.
“Defense lawyers characterized DiPascali as a convicted perjurer who would say and do anything to lighten his expected sentence. But prosecutors repeatedly stressed that DiPascali would face additional criminal charges and prison time if he lied on the witness stand,” USA today stated.
Related News:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readClass Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
6 minute readJetBlue Airways Will Pay $2M to Settle DOT Charges of Chronically Delayed Flights
Trending Stories
- 1Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
- 2Buchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
- 3$2M Settlement for Woman Struck by New Jersey Transit Bus
- 4BREAKING: Donald Trump to Face Sentencing on January 10, Judge Rules
- 5Samuel M. Lehrer, Retired Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge, Dies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250