SEC hearing calls to cut down 10-day stock reporting window
Some officials believe that delay can lead to leaks, and they are pushing the SEC to change the disclosure time, perhaps even as short as one day.
March 31, 2014 at 07:26 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Once an investor acquires at least 5 percent of a company's stock, the investor currently has a 10-day window to announce their holdings to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) per a 1968 regulatory rule. However, some officials believe that delay can lead to leaks, and they are pushing the SEC to change the disclosure time.
Following a Wall Street Journal investigation into the tactics of activist investors, some insiders have taken exception with the 10-day window. According to these officials, activist investors can “leak” their plans to certain favored investors, who can then act on the knowledge before it needs to be reported.
“The SEC's job is to promote market fairness for all investors,” said Sen. Charles Grassley (R.-IA) on the Judiciary Committee. “If the rules don't reflect how the markets work today and allow some investors an unfair advantage over others, the agency needs to update those rules,” he said, according to the WSJ. Otherwise, they can “become obsolete and lead to potential market unfairness.”
One proposed fix to this plan, submitted to the SEC in 2011 by law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, is to cut the 10-day window to one. This way, the firm said, the SEC could cut down on “market manipulation and abusive tactics.”
Although current SEC Chairman Mary Jo White has not publicly commented on the proposed changes, past SEC leadership sees revamping the rules as a good idea. Former SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro told the WSJ on March 27 that the 10-day rule was “a perfect candidate for modernization and rethinking.” She also said in 2011, “We think it's important to modernize our rules, and we are considering whether they should be changed in light of modern investment strategies and innovative financial products.” She said she did not have time to change the rule during her tenure because of the issues surrounding Dodd-Frank.
According to Schapiro, activist investors in opposition to rule changes argue that “there is no evidence that changes in trading technologies and practices have led to significant increases in predisclosure accumulations of large ownership stakes.”
Activist investors have been taking a lot of heat recently. On March 27, SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher called for changes in the SEC's policy with activist investors, and Delaware Chief Justice Leo Strine proposed that activist investors be forced to pay a fee every time they attempt to submit a proposal.
For more on corporate governance and what in-house counsel need to know, check this out:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250