Broadening beyond your specialty niche
This column is inspired by a reader’s topic suggestion, so I start by encouraging you to please contact me with requests. I appreciate them.Many…
June 07, 2017 at 11:10 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
This column is inspired by a reader's topic suggestion, so I start by encouraging you to please contact me with requests. I appreciate them.
Many of our searches are, in fact, subject matter specific requests. Please get us a great securities, or IP, or ERISA attorney, etc. Subject matter experts do hit ceilings once in-house, however.
For subject matter experts who wish to broaden their expertise, either with ambitions of advancement and a managerial role in mind, or simply for intellectual variety, I offer a concrete suggestion.
Maximize a conference opportunity. Specifically, attend sessions outside your comfort zone. And more importantly, don't just take the CLE credit. Summarize a few sessions in a short power point and present the best practice takeaway points to your law department. If you were ever in a law firm, recall the monthly lunches at which one of your colleagues would present updates on the law. Be that person who does something similar for your law department. If you want your General Counsel to give you access to matters and internal clients outside of your subject matter expertise, this is a great starting point for getting to that result.
Our annual Inside Counsel Superconference is coming up soon, June 21-22. I know at least two General Counsel from larger legal departments who send one or two Senior Counsel level attorneys to attend, take notes, and report back on what they learn. I encourage you to own that idea.
If you work in a small to mid-size legal department, your opportunity to break free from a subject matter silo is even greater. Your General Counsel is probably stressed in terms of workload and resources, so he or she may be thrilled at your request to take on more work. You just have to convey the confidence and eagerness to do it.
Also, become the answer conduit for internal non-lawyer clients. Most non-lawyers don't think in terms of subject matter expertise; they simply go to lawyers with their business problems. Some of you may turn the opportunity over to another lawyer (internal or external) when the problem is outside your comfort zone. Unless you risk political hell by taking this advice, I encourage you to own the problem and work with the client on it. That may involve a subject matter learning curve for you, and it may mean tapping into your lawyer/friend network for a little guidance before advising the business unit.
Once internal clients view you as a problem solver, you are one step closer to the role of general counselor and advisor. Now you are breaking beyond your subject matter expertise.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Want to Get Ahead in Your Career? Find a Truth Teller
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250