The Future of Big Data and Intellectual Property
IP data is uniquely suited for big data tools and techniques because of its high volume, high variety, and high velocity of changes.The intellectual…
June 13, 2017 at 06:30 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
IP data is uniquely suited for big data tools and techniques because of its high volume, high variety, and high velocity of changes.
The intellectual property space is becoming increasingly competitive and organizations that create IP have a smaller window than ever before to ensure it is protected and exploited internationally. IP data is suited for big data tools and techniques because of its high volume, high variety, and high velocity of changes. And, IP departments can apply larger data sets and smarter analytics to drive value in the creation and protection of IP.
Simon Webster, CEO at CPA Global, recently sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss how big data tools and technologies can be used in the patent world to drastically improve patent analysis – from how behavioural analysis can reveal the likelihood of patent issuance during prosecution to international IP portfolio management.
Today, big data is important when it comes to IP because it can help better decision making. In fact, up to 85 percent of a company's value lies in its IP portfolio and it is often a key driver in the most high-profile acquisitions and mergers. Almost every company can improve its efficiency through modern technologies to drive increased insight through big data.
“Companies used to struggle to gain the required insight from data that helped them make better strategic decisions,” he said. “With the availability of on demand computing and storage and the application of artificial intelligence to process vast volumes of data quickly, all businesses are now looking for insight that can help shape company direction.”
For example, a supermarket might analyse sales patterns against the weather to see if certain products are more popular in warmer weather – they can then use this to more accurately manage stock. Companies can gain access to data on around 100 million patents across 100 different jurisdictions. Insight from this data provides the capability for companies and law firms to understand more about who owns which patents.
“If you imagine a world where future research and development direction is shaped by real data about IP strengths and weaknesses within a company, you have some idea how big data can help companies with IP issues,” said Webster.
However, these days, organizations that create IP have a smaller window to ensure it is protected and exploited internationally because of digitization, per Webster. In 1955 the first McDonalds restaurant opened in the U.S and it took 12 years for the company to open its first overseas restaurant. Even then, it was in the nearest country – geographically and culturally – to its home market: Canada. The 12-year time frame provided the brand with plenty of time to establish itself in its home market, plan a strategy of growth and execute. Additionally, Facebook is currently 12 years old – the same age that McDonalds was when it opened its first overseas fast food restaurant. But, Facebook operates in virtually every country, has almost two billion active users and a brand value of more than $50 billion.
“In a digital environment, this timescale is unthinkable – companies and industries are destroyed in a fraction of that time,” he explained. “Every business anywhere in the world is a global business from the moment it has a website. The business environment has sped up and will continue to do so. Businesses therefore must protect their ideas more quickly and effectively on a global basis to gain the maximum benefit from ideas generation.”
IP data can shape investment decisions in research and development, help companies understand their relative strengths and weaknesses against their competitors and enable them to understand more about the potential opportunities in new markets, according to Webster.
“Every industry is facing opportunities and threats from different geographies, adjacent industries and game changing technologies,” said Webster. “Companies have less time to react to this environment. Strategic business planning on an ongoing basis relies on insight into a complex data set of changing information and analytics within IP data sources can help ensure better business decisions.”
Now, the most advanced corporations are combining internal data on their most profitable patents with external data on new markets to understand where opportunities might exist around the globe to launch new products and monetise more of their IP. This helps with business planning and growth strategies as well as managing investment costs of globalising products more efficiently.
“The tools are here today, with further advanced applications being deployed in a matter of months,” he explained. “Companies that are still manually searching for relevant IP information are not only having to deploy resources that are less efficient, they are also missing the critical business insight that comes from connecting disparate data sets.”
These days, the resources available to the IP professional go wider and deeper than ever before and offer the opportunity to make much more informed decisions around their current and future IP portfolio. But, the real transformation comes in the impact that access to relevant data has for how a business grows and develops over time – impacting diverse areas such as investment strategy, global growth and product development.
He added, “The argument for IP Officers to be an integral part of the entire business planning and development process has never been stronger. Armed with insight, driven from internal and external data, analysed effectively, IP professionals can extend their reach beyond the IP department and more fully shape boardroom strategy.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMyriad Genetics Hires NIH Scientist-Turned-Biopharma Lawyer as Legal Chief
Patent Data Unicorn Names First GC, Hiring From Another AI-Driven Unicorn
3 minute readMeta Transfers AI-Related Patents to Midjourney to Thwart Patent Trolls
Google, HP Alum Hired as GC of Startup Bringing AI to Classrooms
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250