Why Support for Legalization of Medical Marijuana is Higher Than Ever
Attorney General Jeff Sessions recently asked congress to allow him to prosecute medical marijuana providers, which was set into place back in 2014. Today,…
June 22, 2017 at 09:25 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Attorney General Jeff Sessions recently asked congress to allow him to prosecute medical marijuana providers, which was set into place back in 2014. Today, the benefits of medical marijuana have been shown to reduce pain, treat glaucoma, help control seizures and lessen symptoms of multiple sclerosis. And, tax revenues from the 29 states that allow medical marijuana are projected to bring in hundreds of millions of dollars for state and local government programs.
“Support for the legalization of medical marijuana is higher than ever,” said Steve Janjic, CEO of Amercanex, in a recent interview with Inside Counsel. “This April, a CBS News poll found that 61 percent of Americans believe marijuana use should be legalized and Quinnipiac found that 94 percent of American voters support the use of marijuana for medical purposes.”
Janjic founded Amercanex to provide a transparent, neutral and non-manipulated marketplace for institutional cannabis-industry participants, including growers and retailers. The company strictly adheres to the centralizing regulatory and reporting requirements to local and regional regulatory authorities. He is also the former global head of eFX Sales and Distribution at Tullett Prebon, one of the world's largest institutional brokerage firms, with 168 years in the marketplace.
“We hope the medical community and our government officials can persuade Attorney General Sessions how important our industry is to the public,” said Janjic.
The Attorney General has not outlined a policy for medical marijuana. Per Janjic, he has stated he is not in favor of the Cole Memo and has written a memo asking to change the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, but his position cannot act without the consent of Congress.
But, the economic benefits of legalizing cannabis would be a huge win for state and federal government budgets. In fact, last year in Colorado, the state collected more than $135 in taxes. California, which voted to legalize recreational marijuana, is projected to exceed $15 billion in sales and $3 billion in tax revenue, according to ICF International.
“The money from taxes would help balance strained budgets for pensions, healthcare, housing, education and social programs,” he explained. “It would also allow police and law enforcement to spend less money and resources on marijuana enforcement and more on serious drug offenses and crimes.”
In April, a CBS News poll found that 61 percent of Americans believe marijuana use should be legalized and Quinnipiac found that 94 percent of American voters support the use of marijuana for medical purposes. The benefits of medical marijuana have been shown to reduce pain, treat glaucoma, help control seizures and lessen symptoms of multiple sclerosis.
“Tax revenues from the 29 states that allow medical marijuana is projected to bring in hundreds of millions of dollars for state and local government programs,” Janjic said. “We hope the medical community and our government officials can persuade Attorney General Sessions how important our industry is to the public.”
So, how exactly could the legalization of marijuana change the litigation world?
According to Janjic, legalizing cannabis would reduce the caseload for prosecutors and law enforcement and it would lessen the number of inmates jailed for low-grade offenses.
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250