Brexit Boon? UK Ahead of EU, US in GDPR Preparation
Corporations in the U.K., U.S. and EU are preparing for the GDPR at vastly different speeds.Here's a fact that will leave many scratching their heads:…
July 06, 2017 at 07:22 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Corporations in the U.K., U.S. and EU are preparing for the GDPR at vastly different speeds.
Here's a fact that will leave many scratching their heads: the corporations most actively preparing for the European Union's (EU) General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR) hail from the one country looking to greatly distance itself from the European continent.
Despite a looming Brexit, U.K. corporations are leading the way with GDPR compliance, with 40 percent having begun GDPR preparations, compared with 28 percent in the EU and 5 percent in the U.S., according a survey of over 800 corporate IT professionals across the three regions conducted by IT community organization Spiceworks. In addition, the survey found that 5 percent of organizations in the U.K. are fully prepared for the regulation, more than double the amount in the EU and U.S.
Though the U.K. may decide to implement its own data privacy regulation once it leaves the EU as planned in spring 2019, a year after the GDPR's early 2018 implementation, U.K. corporations that store, process or collect any EU citizens' personal data will be bound to comply with the GDPR, due to the regulation's extraterritorial reach. Peter Tsai, a senior technology analyst at Spiceworks and author of the report detailing the survey's findings, noted that the higher level of preparation in the U.K. is in large part due to the expected impact of the impending Brexit. By focusing on the GDPR now, he explained, U.K. organizations are looking to free up employees tasked with regulatory compliance to grapple with potential new laws and regulations the U.K. will pass once untangled from EU jurisdiction.
Tsai added that he believed the U.K. was moving quickly because “there aren't as many consultants that are up to date on, and could help with, GDPR compliance” as there are in the EU. U.K. organizations, therefore, needed to take extra time to prepare and understand the regulation.
The U.K.'s focus on the GDPR stands in contrast to the EU, where the survey found only 23 percent of corporations plan to begin preparing for the GDPR within the next three to 12 months, while 14 percent havs no set plans to prepare as of yet.
Tsai linked the EU's slow pace to the fact that its local organizations are accustomed to “treating data more carefully and thoughtfully” than those in other countries, and would therefore have to spend far less time coming into compliance with the GDPR.
Tsai said U.S. organizations face the biggest hurdle with GDPR compliance because many “don't even know they need to comply, and they aren't following EU regulations for data privacy already, so the gap from where they are and where they need to be is greater than their EU counterparts.”
The survey found that U.S. organizations were the least knowledgeable about GDPR's effects on their businesses, though a majority in the U.K. and EU were likewise unaware of the regulation's repercussions as well. While 43 percent of U.K. professionals were informed about the GDPR's impact on their businesses, only 36 percent in the EU and 9 percent in the U.S. knew the same.
For Tsai, the confusion over the impact and compliance requirements of the GDPR is due to the regulation's complexity and scope. “This regulation is unchartered territory for some companies that have never seen a regulation like this before, especially in the U.S.”
He noted that the GDPR can also be vague in detailing concrete actions companies can take for compliance.
“Just reading the regulation you don't know what solutions you need to buy, what type of training you need to give to your end user, what type of data practices you need to follow, or what the best practices you need established,” he added.
Contact Rhys Dipshan at [email protected]. On Twitter: @R_Dipshan.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250