How Bass Pro Resolved the EEOC's Long-Running Bias Case
Company must hire a diversity director, and boost recruitment efforts.Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC agreed to pay $10.5 million and bolster its…
July 27, 2017 at 01:43 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Company must hire a diversity director, and boost recruitment efforts.
Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC agreed to pay $10.5 million and bolster its efforts to hire a more diverse workforce at its retail stores that sell fishing, camping and hunting equipment, following a complaint brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The nationwide settlement, ending a long-running employment discrimination case, comes with more than a hefty price tag.
The resolution imposes certain conditions on the Missouri-based retailer to comply and improve its practices for hiring Hispanic and African-American workers at its stores around the country, according to a consent decree filed in Houston federal district court.
The EEOC filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas against the retailer in 2011, charging that the company discriminated in hiring at its stores, unlawfully retaliated against employees who opposed these practices and failed to adhere to federal record-keeping laws and regulations.
The complaint claimed that since 2005, qualified black and Hispanic workers were denied positions at Bass Pro Stores. In Texas and Louisiana locations, the store managers were accused of making racially derogatory remarks. The investigation found classwide hiring discrimination and evidence of retaliation. The settlement outlines which claimants, denied employment at Bass Pro, could be eligible for compensation.
In a statement Thursday, Bass Pro Shop said the agreement did not substantiate the EEOC's allegations of discrimination against the company's founder, John Morris. The company did not admit to violating any laws. The company said it is “fully committed to the expansion of its ongoing efforts to attract a more diverse workforce.”
A lawyer for Bass Pro, King & Spalding partner Michael Johnston in Atlanta, was not reached for comment.
The agreement is similar to a settlement reached between the EEOC and Cabela's in September 2015. The two companies have a pending merger agreement.
Here are key provisions that Bass Pro Shop was tasked with implementing as part of the settlement.
|Bass Pro must boost its recruitment efforts.
As part of an effort to increase employee diversity, the retailer will be required to actively recruit qualified black and Hispanic applicants. Some of these efforts will include reaching out to colleges, universities and community colleges identified by the EEOC with significant minority populations to post openings, participate in job fairs and post job openings in publications that circulate in Spanish and on websites directed at the Hispanic community.
|The deal requires Bass Pro to ramp up employee training.
Both managers and nonmanagers will be trained in diversity efforts. An annual training will be required for all nonmanagement employees, to inform the workers about Title VII prohibition on discrimination based on race and national original. The managers will attend a separate session to cover these issues. An outside trainer approved by the EEOC, but paid for by Bass Pro Shop, will conduct the trainings.
|Bass Pro must hire a diversity director.
In order to ensure implementation of the initiatives, Bass Pro will establish an Office of Diversity and Inclusion and hire a diversity director to oversee the department. This new position will be tasked with executing the EEOC agreement and the inclusion efforts throughout the company. The director can be hired from within the company or outside but must have at least five years of experience in areas of human resources or equal-employment work, and a four-year college degree and at least 120 hours of coursework and training in the appropriate areas.
|And the company needs to be open about its policies.
On its website, Bass Pro must develop a diversity inclusion section for posting and discussing job opportunities. A written description of hiring procedures will be disclosed to all applicants and have in place a job-related hiring criteria to prohibit discriminatory hiring decisions. The company will also develop and implement a complaint process to be incorporated into the employment application. An internal complaint procedure will also be established. These efforts will be part of a requirement to review policies at the company against discrimination and retaliation.
Related Articles:
|- Trump Administration Lines Up Against EEOC in LGBT Workplace Rights Case
- 50 Companies Tell Court Sexual Orientation Discrimination Is Bad For Business
- Burlington GC Janet Dhillon, Trump's Pick for EEOC, Discloses Ethics Pledge, Salary
- Ex-EEOC GC David Lopez, Morgan Lewis' Speights Deconstruct Federal Labor Rules
- Bass Pro, Fighting Discrimination Claims, Loses Challenge to EEOC in Fifth Circuit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1What to Know About Naming a Law Firm
- 2Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
- 3Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 4Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 5Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250