How Businesses Can Adapt to Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning will change the landscape of the workplace, but the need to develop and nurture great teams and leaders…
August 09, 2017 at 07:35 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning will change the landscape of the workplace, but the need to develop and nurture great teams and leaders will remain in human hands for decades to come. Artificial intelligence is about efficiency, scope, and data – creating high-performance workplace cultures where employees look forward to coming to work is about trust and emotional connections.
Don Rheem is CEO of E3 Solutions, recently sat down with Inside Counsel for an exclusive interview. Rheem focuses on using science-backed research to consult with leaders at all levels within an organization and his passion for delivering truly outstanding improvements in business performance conveys quickly to the CEOs and key executives he works with.
AI will change the legal landscape in a similar way it will change the terrain for all organizations, according to Rheem. It will process data in ways that reduce risk, increase possibilities, and determine correlations and causal relationships that would be impossible for the human brain. However, AI will not nurture better leaders, reduce turnover, develop vibrant workplace cultures, or strengthen the relational well-being of employees that come to work every day. He said, “Those tasks, typically under developed in law firms today, will remain the responsibility of front-line leaders.”
“We are hardwired at birth to be in a group and centuries of relational development among human beings has also demonstrated a critical role for effective leaders in developing high-performance teams and workplace cultures,” Rheem said. “Artificial intelligence offers a lot of promise in the workplace, but leadership is not on that list.”
Today, AI is a compelling topic as it will have a pervasive impact in the workplace, so we must be careful though, not to anthropomorphize its capabilities. Further, AI and machine learning will deliver their greatest promise by increasing efficiencies in organizations, and digesting enormous amounts of data as it searches for value that might be hidden within.
“Human beings simply cannot compete with this ability to digest vast amounts of information for insights,” he explained. ”While AI will be good at identifying relationships between words, even concepts, and data, it will remain for many years to come a tool, rather than a social resource lawyers can use relationally to load share, form bonds, seek validation or receive recognition.”
The brain has limited energy and it is always searching for ways to do things more efficiently. That is, to do things using the least amount of metabolic load. From the brain's perspective, the most efficient way to accomplish things is with others – with people that are trusted and reliable – that we can load share the task with. The brain views these social resources interchangeably with physical resources like water and food.
“The key to load sharing is to be among people that are predictable and consistent, and thus trustworthy. This is a critical function that takes place primarily in the brain's limbic system,” explained Rheem. “The determination of trustworthiness is fundamentally an emotional process that includes our constant evaluation of the people around us, in our relationships, to determine who we can rely on in key moments.”
So, what will AI do for law firms and law departments in the future?
According to Rheem, AI like robotics and machine learning, is most likely to reduce the need for employees that do repetitive, mundane, and process -related tasks within an organization.
“For example, within five years AI will be playing a major role in a law firm's research department. In 10 years it will be the research department.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 2Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 3Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 4Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 5De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250