OCC Has Banking Sandbox-Like 'Pilot' for Fintechs in the Works
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is looking to launch what it calls a bank-run "pilot" that would help support financial technology companies,…
August 11, 2017 at 07:12 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is looking to launch what it calls a bank-run “pilot” that would help support financial technology companies, according to the federal banking regulator's chief counsel.
In her keynote address at the American Bar Association's annual meeting in New York Thursday, Amy Friend, senior deputy comptroller and chief counsel at the OCC, said the agency is exploring opportunities to create a regulatory sandbox, an environment in which companies can test new products and business models without worrying about the regulatory consequences.
Friend shared how the OCC's Office of Innovation has been researching how other agencies in the U.S. and abroad are embracing the financial technology sector. She pointed to the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K., which has been held up as a global leader in the space, known for encouraging innovation.
U.S. regulators are increasingly expressing interest in engaging fintech companies as well. In May, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced the launch of LabCFTC, an initiative designed to give fintechs greater access to the commission and to encourage them to ask regulatory questions and offer feedback as to which regulations they find the most prohibitive. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had previously launched a similar initiative called Project Catalyst, where it invited fintech companies to participate in initiatives that inform the bureau's policy work.
The OCC has chosen to model some of its work after the FCA, including consideration of “bank-run pilots, sandboxes, whatever you want to call them,” Friend said.
Friend shared how the former OCC Comptroller Thomas Curry, who stepped down in May, expressed concerns about using the term “sandboxes” because he thought “that might provide a safe harbor [for fintech participants], with respect to consumer harm.”
“I don't think that's the way sandboxes really work but we've been calling them 'pilots' and we're working on what we would be comfortable with,” she explained. “We view bank-run pilots as a way to gather information useful to us as a way to share our perspective with banks that may be engaging in some type of innovation before they get too far down the road. So we're looking at … bank-fintech partnerships in the piloting program.”
Friend said the agency does not have a set time frame in mind of when the pilot could be introduced, only that “it's something the Office of Innovation has been looking at.” Some of their considerations with the pilot are: “What kind of piloting program would we be comfortable with? What would sort of serve our need for information and would also provide value to the companies that are engaged in the pilot?”
Contact Stephanie Forshee at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Divorce Timing Is Everything: Waiting for the New Year May Have Its Advantages
- 2Bracewell Adds Former Pioneer Natural Resources Lawyer to O&G, Energy Transition Practices
- 3Send Us Your New Partners for The Legal's 2025 New Partners Yearbook
- 4Another US Firm Shutters London Office
- 5The Future of Data Protection Enforcement: It’s Hammer Time!
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250