Odebrecht Bribery Probes Continue Around the World
Just how far did the bribery tentacles of Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht reach? The company has admitted paying $788 million in bribes…
September 15, 2017 at 01:32 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Just how far did the bribery tentacles of Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht reach? The company has admitted paying $788 million in bribes in at least a dozen countries, mostly in Latin America, while investigations are underway in four more, according to an in-depth report this week by the British Broadcasting Corp.
And the Brazilian newspaper O Globo has reported that 29 countries, including the U.S., Sweden, France and the U.K., have asked Brazil for help with their own Odebrecht probes. Brazil asked a total of 38 countries to help in its own investigation. Odebrecht's attorneys at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan could not immediately be reached for comment.
The U.S. Department of Justice, Brazil and Switzerland jointly prosecuted the company, which pleaded guilty last December to violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. At sentencing in April, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York imposed a $3.5 billion fine, the largest global fine ever in an FCPA case. And the investigations continue into individuals involved in the bribery schemes, while allegations have touched several current and former Latin American politicians, including Brazilian President Michel Temer, his foreign minister and his chief of staff.
Odebrecht terminated 51 employees, many of them high-ranking executives, according to the statement of facts attached to its plea agreement. One of those employees was CEO Marcelo Odebrecht, who was sentenced to 19 years in prison.
The company has since hired a full-time chief compliance officer, begun implementing a compliance program and added an independent compliance monitor for three years, as required under the terms of its plea deal.
The BBC report, based on documents from the DOJ and Brazil as well as various news reports from other countries, named the countries and the dollar amount of bribes that were accepted in those nations. The BBC said recipients in Brazil pocketed the most money, with $349 million, followed by Venezuela with $98 million and the Dominican Republic with $92 million.
Other countries where Odebrecht has admitted making bribes, listed from highest total payout to lowest, were Panama ($59 million), Angola, Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Guatemala, Colombia, Mexico and Mozambique ($1 million). Other countries where the BBC said investigations continue are Antigua, El Salvador, Chile and Portugal.
A noteworthy part of the report, based on the U.S. plea deal and statement of facts, involved how Odebrecht ran its bribe operation. The DOJ said the company created, in effect, a department of bribery, which it called its Division of Structured Operations.
The company admitted in the plea deal that the division set up offshore shell companies and sometimes laundered the money through as many as four banks before it reached recipients. At one point, the division acquired its own bank branch in Antigua so it could set up accounts for politicians and funnel money directly into them.
The division had its own private computer systems, one for financial records and one for communicating secretly with co-conspirators through secure emails and instant messaging by using code names.
The BBC report added, “They gave their recipients flippant code names: Dracula, Sauerkraut, Decrepit, Totally Ugly. One politician, whose wife was 40 years younger than him, got the code name Viagra.”
Contact Sue Reisinger at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Trending Stories
- 1Despite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
- 2Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Del. Supreme Court
- 3Ex-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
- 4Dispute Resolution Boards—Getting Real Time Decisions on Construction Projects
- 5Commonwealth Court Overturns Award of Damages Assessed Against Landlord on Claims of Unlawful Discrimination
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250