Mobile Hijackers Meet Their Match with Blockchain
There is a scary new reality that mobile phone numbers are now being used against users. As the popularity of two-factor authentication has grown, hackers…
September 19, 2017 at 04:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
There is a scary new reality that mobile phone numbers are now being used against users. As the popularity of two-factor authentication has grown, hackers quickly learned how to compromise a mobile phone number to gain access to all kinds of personal information – resulting in about $2.3 billion in account takeover fraud in 2016. Since two-factor authentication is becoming obsolete, users must turn to other solutions to protect personal information.
Armin Ebrahimi, founder & CEO of ShoCard, sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss multifactor authentication and the protection that storage on the blockchain provides to users. ShoCard is a digital identity verification system that protects consumer privacy through its use of blockchain data layer, eliminates the need for usernames and passwords. Using multi-factor authentication in conjunction with storage on the blockchain, it protects users' identities on a level that is unable to be compromised.
“Phone numbers are widely used as a second factor. While initially, this has been a great second factor, inevitably, hackers who want to access user accounts are drawn to exploit it and are finding new ways to exploit phone numbers,” he explained. “Since authentication systems have made a big bet on the security of phone numbers as the second factor, it provides the greatest opportunity for hackers to get in.”
In fact, a hacker doesn't need a phone number as a second factor and it can be their only factor. Most prominent two-factor authentication (2FA) systems allow a user to go through “forgot-password” flow without entering a password and only using their phone number as their second factor to reset a new password, gaining access to an account. Therefore, phone numbers have become a single-factor authentication for hackers.
Today, there are two common ways of accessing user phones: Get access to view incoming clear text messages to read OTP (One Time Passwords) and hackers who have a user's personal information can call mobile carriers and claim to have lost their phone and get a new sim-card with the real-user's phone number.
So, what are some alternative solutions users should use to protect personal information?
Storing data on the blockchain is an effective way to protect personal information, per Ebrahimi. ShoCard has built technology that leverages the blockchain as an underlying piece of its architecture to provide identity management for users and enterprises. The ShoCard platform uses public/private key encryption and data hashing to safely store and exchange identity information. It's a form of multi-factor authentication with out-of-band communication and data matching, implementing private keys and hashes throughout the process. The blockchain allows ShoCard to create a secure, distributed trust system with the benefits of a federated identity system.
According to Ebrahimi, there are many key benefits to multifactor authentication. First, the fact that PII is not stored in any usable way either on ShoCard's servers or on the blockchain allows a user's personally identifiable information (PII) to be collected by the app, encrypted and stored locally on their device. Then, a one-way hashed, digital signature of those fields are created using the user's private-key and is stored on the blockchain. The original PII, when processed in this way, cannot be deduced or extracted in any way. The user's PII can then be validated and certified by a trusted entity like an identity verification provider, a government agency or corporate office.
Ebrahimi explained, “Using a method like the above process, these certifications are also stored on the blockchain using the verifier's private key. Once this data has been certified, the user can then interact with other parties and verify their identity or, if they choose, exchange personal data through a completely secure process. Similarly, enterprises can also provide validations of their own identity so that others can be assured of who they are interacting with.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250