Law Department Politics 101
A new General Counsel has just joined your company, and she was an external hire. …
September 22, 2017 at 10:14 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A new General Counsel has just joined your company, and she was an external hire.
For service providers, like my search firm, a new GC from the outside usually means dramatic change. This summer, I lost a long term corporate client, because a new GC is happy with, and loyal to, a different search firm. I understand that dynamic and don't take it personally. In fact, I picked up a new corporate client two weeks later. Why? Because the new GC of another company happens to be someone who was pleased with our firm in his previous position.
For law firms with existing matters and multiple internal relationships, change of this kind usually happens more slowly. But it happens. Outside providers recognize leadership change as both a threat and an opportunity, and we scramble to win within the new political landscape. Sales professionals from all disciplines have understood this dynamic for years, which is why many mine LinkedIn and corporate press releases to identify prospects based mainly on leadership changes.
Many inside counsel can learn from this outside provider perspective. Too often, you fail to appreciate the impact of a leadership change on your career. Politically savvy inside counsel understand that a new GC, especially one coming from outside, means everything to them.
My best advice for winning in a changing political landscape is to pretend that you are on an extended job interview. Learn what the new GC values and get on-board from Day One with the culture she wants to create and the goals she wants to accomplish. Borrowing from my inner nerd to use a Star Trek quote: “Resistance is futile.”
I am always surprised by how many inside counsel don't get this intuitively. Many of you feel that a new GC needs to prove himself to the department and you take a wait and see attitude. Not only do you resist change, but you become the voice that explains how things are “normally” done at your company. You may even think you are helping the new GC by offering such guidance.
To be blunt: there will be winners and losers within your law department after a new GC takes the helm. You may see a colleague retire earlier than you expected. You will probably see someone promoted internally more quickly than you expected (hopefully that is you!). The law department's organizational chart will change in six to twelve months.
Be aware and stay aware. If you sense that your experience profile, or pedigree, or personality is not in sync with the new GC, trust your gut. You are in trouble. Don't make the error of laziness or the error of hubris and sit tight. Start a confidential job search. Don't become an undervalued member of a changing team, even if you can hang tight and hold onto your job.
Most new GCs from the outside want to identify key players from the existing law department. A new GC can be the best thing to happen for your career. You will know quickly.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 4Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250