When It Comes to Anti-Money Laundering, Challenges Abound for Compliance Pros
When Thomson Reuters surveyed a global group of legal and compliance professionals recently about anti-money laundering issues, nearly one-third…
September 28, 2017 at 09:20 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
When Thomson Reuters surveyed a global group of legal and compliance professionals recently about anti-money laundering issues, nearly one-third said their companies have experienced some form of a regulatory action in this space.
But 16 percent said they weren't sure, an answer that really bothered Mark Haddad, vice president of the corporate segment for Thomson Reuters.
Thomson Reuters conducted the survey of 438 AML compliance leaders connected with the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists, and Haddad discussed the results at a recent ACAMS conference.
“How can I mobilize a large group of people to comply with regulations or with a consent decree if 16 percent aren't even sure if their company is subject to an action?” Haddad asked in an interview with Corporate Counsel. “It highlights the operational challenge for this group, and the disconnect going on in their operations.”
Respondents said the greatest operational challenges for their financial institutions stemmed from increased regulations (38 percent), a lack of properly trained staff (31 percent) and budget constraints (28 percent).
“As new regulations continue to be implemented, two-thirds of the survey respondents noted they anticipate an increase in their workload in the coming year related to anti-money laundering and customer due diligence,” Haddad said.
And among the challenges, the professionals said the rules creating the most workload were local regulations, such as those from the New York Department of Financial Services. In second place were the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) rules enacted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; the UBO rules are set to take effect in May 2018.
The FinCEN rules require financial institutions to validate who is the beneficial owner of any account. According to the survey, at the moment, 89 percent of organizations simply verify UBO information by asking the customer, who may be a frontman for a money launderer.
Some 58 percent of survey participants cite the inability to validate UBO data as their greatest operating challenge.
Only three in five respondents said they were confident their organizations will be able to comply with the new FinCEN rules by the deadline.
In other findings, the report said:
• An estimated $800 billion to $2 trillion is laundered every year by the global financial industry, often making it an unwitting financier for terrorist networks, drug cartels and other criminal groups.
• While filing timely and accurate suspicious-activity reports is vital for an effective AML program, a majority of survey participants stated they did not know how many of their reports were false positives or false negatives.
• The top priority for the professionals in the next year is to improve data management and quality.
• Making more informed budget decisions is key, as 72 percent of respondents did not know their organizations' dedicated budget for anti-money laundering/customer due diligence screening.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Tech Is Cozying Up to President Trump. Here's Why Their Lawyers Are Cautiously Optimistic
Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 1LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 2An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 3Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 4How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 5Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250