Are Our Phones the Next Victims of Hacking?
Lately, there is no shortage of hacks going on and the next vulnerability could be right in the palm of your hand – literally. Millions of mobile…
October 04, 2017 at 11:27 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lately, there is no shortage of hacks going on and the next vulnerability could be right in the palm of your hand – literally. Millions of mobile phones, laptops and home devices could be at risk of hacking after researchers discovered a new way to take over devices using the Bluetooth connection. They found a way to take over devices remotely stealing data and even hacking the camera.
Michael Sorrentino, CEO of the Eye Patch Case, recently sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss how consumer can protect themselves from future hacks. “Software updates make life easier and give our tech longer lifecycles, but we sacrifice vulnerability,” he said. “That's why consumers need a hack-proof layer of security, and that's through hardware like ours – you simply can't hack a piece of plastic.”
To date, Android phones have been more vulnerable than Apple products, but this report should be a wake-up call to users of the world's most popular smartphone model Apple's iPhone. Android phones are more open than Apple because Android must be compatible with thousands of devices, while Apple controls the hardware as well as the software. This allows for more vulnerabilities in the software, according to Sorrentino. Consumers want their phones to reflect their sense of style, and there's a new wave of security products like the EyePatch Case, which allows consumers to add a layer of security without sacrificing appearance.
So, why are there an increasing number of hacks going on lately? Many reasons, according to Sorrentino – from corporate espionage to a jealous ex, there are many people who would just LOVE to get at all the precious data on your phone. This includes your contacts, recent conversations, and even a live stream from your always-on video camera.
“Like cracks in a wall, as devices become more sophisticated there are more openings in software for hackers to exploit,” he explained. “We put too much blind trust into our computers and phones, when we should all be more vigilant.”
Like many of us, you may have Bluetooth enabled on your phone all the time. However, a recent piece of malware called “Blueborne” tricks a phone into thinking it is pairing with a safe device. It then plants malicious software that can do any number of things from accessing the camera, microphone, or your personal data and contacts.
In this case, researchers were able to take over devices remotely stealing data and even hacking the camera. Per Sorrentino, they did so by exploiting software vulnerabilities in Android, iOS, and Windows phones, they were able to access the camera. Apple, Google, and Microsoft all say they have patched these bugs, but the simple truth is that hackers will always find a way.
“We all need an additional layer of security for peace of mind, if nothing else,” he said. “We simply cannot rely on software alone to protect us, we need to add a hack-proof hardware solution (like the EyePatch Case) that you just can't bypass.”
What are ways consumers can protect themselves?
Sorrentino advises not to connect to strange Wi-Fi networks, turn off Bluetooth when not using it (it'll also save your battery), and have a good password (that's not simply “password”). In addition, use the tools that are out there – companies like EyePatch Case provide an elegant solution to security by incorporating a simple lens cover over your phone's cameras.
He said, “You need a layered approach combined with common sense.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 4Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250