IP is the Most Import Asset in the U.S.
Today, Intellectual Property is also one of our nation's most important assets. Consider the economic contributions that many copyright-intensive industries…
October 11, 2017 at 10:57 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Today, Intellectual Property is also one of our nation's most important assets. Consider the economic contributions that many copyright-intensive industries make every year: $1.2 trillion from the biopharmaceutical sector in 2014, $15 billion from the recording industry in 2015 and $10.3 billion from the film industry that same year. And, these industries support 57.6 million American jobs.
Brian Pomper, executive director of ACTION for Trade, sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss the ways in which IP contributes to our country, as well as ways we can better protect it. ACTION is a new coalition of trade associations and businesses on a mission to implement better protections for U.S. IP while shaping trade policy.
“IP-intensive industries drive innovation in the U.S. and cement its role as the world's most innovative nation,” he said. “These industries invest more money in research and development than their peers. For instance, IP-intensive manufacturing firms spend nearly 12 times more on R&D per employee than non-IP industries.”
In 2015, the U.S. recording industry reported roughly $15 billion in revenues; the film industry logged more than $10 billion. The publishing industry contributed $60 billion to the U.S. economy that same year. But, beyond just the numbers, exports of U.S. movies, music, and software are an important source of America's soft power, spreading American culture around the world.
IP-intensive industries are some of the top job producers in this country, according to Pomper. About 60 million people work in IP-intensive industries. And they're well compensated — employees within IP-intensive industries are paid 45 percent more than those who work in non-IP industries. Ninety-six percent of firms in IP-intensive manufacturing industries are small businesses, and between 2002 and 2006, small firms received 15 times more patents per employee than did large firms.
“Stronger protections for copyrights, patents, and trademarks in trade agreements and trade policy are needed to protect intellectual property. U.S. IP protections typically end at the U.S. border,” he explained. “So, in many nations, American innovators can see their handiwork counterfeited or pirated with impunity. Nearly half of all U.S. businesses have lost money because of IP theft.”
In addition, U.S. authorities must strongly enforce laws protecting copyrights, trademarks, and patents. For instance, border patrol agents could be more proactive about confiscating counterfeit goods before they enter the U.S.
Pomper said, “Judges could levy stiffer penalties on those who violate laws protecting intellectual property. And nations must work together to more effectively protect their citizens' IP.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Policy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250