Legal Chiefs' Total Compensation Up Four Percent From Last Year, Report Says
There are fewer topics that pique more interest in the workplace than—how much is the boss getting paid? In-house lawyers curious about the…
October 11, 2017 at 08:04 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
There are fewer topics that pique more interest in the workplace than—how much is the boss getting paid? In-house lawyers curious about the paychecks that the top dogs in their legal departments bring home might find some answers in a new report released Tuesday.
According to the report from board intelligence solutions provider Equilar and boutique executive search firm BarkerGilmore, median total direct compensation for top legal officers grew 4 percent overall in 2016.
The report analyzed publicly disclosed pay data from more than 1,100 public companies at a range of revenue levels. Total direct compensation was calculated as the sum of salary, bonus, nonequity incentive plan compensation, stock awards, options and most other forms of possible remuneration.
Robert Barker, managing partner for BarkerGilmore, said in a press release announcing the report's publication that legal chiefs tend to get increased compensation as their overall roles continue to expand.
“Top legal officers continue to be tasked with broader responsibilities beyond the legal, compliance and governance functions, to include government relations, human resources, communications, and even business oversight, and as a result, compensation follows suit,” he said.
It might come as a surprise to some that top lawyers at companies that the report places on the lower end of the revenue spectrum—with $1 billion to $5 billion in revenue—fared especially well. Between 2015 and 2016, lawyers in this category saw a jump of 8.1 percent in total compensation. Median total compensation for these attorneys last year was $1.5 million.
The year-over-year increase for more middling companies (those with revenue from $5 billion to $15 billion) was somewhat less at 3.3 percent. The largest companies in the report, those with $15 billion or more in revenue, actually experienced a slight drop of 0.6 percent in legal leaders' total compensation. But these top lawyers at the companies with the most revenue still got hefty paychecks, earning median total compensation of $3.8 million.
The report also broke down total compensation to examine its components, including stock awards. Increased equity awards are part of a bigger story for companies' leading lawyers, according to John Gilmore, a managing partner at BarkerGilmore.
“The reflection of the newly found power of the GC is apparent in the transition of their title to chief legal officer, indicating they have taken a seat at the boardroom table to join other C-suite executives who are compensated with significant equity grants,” Gilmore said in the Tuesday press release.
Legal department leaders are doing well on the equity side, particularly at companies with higher revenue, according to the report. In 2016, stock-based awards granted to companies with more than $15 billion in revenue came in at a median of $1.6 million in value. This is almost twice the median value of the awards received by the legal leaders at companies the next revenue level down.
And for top lawyers who want a lot of their pay in stock-based awards, the technology sector is the place to be. Legal chiefs in tech received an average of 63 percent of their total compensation packages in stock awards. No other sector broke 50 percent in this category.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250