Survey: Legal Departments Not Meeting L&E Budgets
A new survey from Proskauer Rose shows how legal departments are handling labor and employment budgets and staffing.Most legal departments that set aside…
October 11, 2017 at 08:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A new survey from Proskauer Rose shows how legal departments are handling labor and employment budgets and staffing.
Most legal departments that set aside a budget for labor and employment matters are not meeting those budgets, as unpredictability in claims and higher than anticipated costs have in some cases pushed budgets up, according to a survey released Wednesday.
The survey from Proskauer Rose, the second that the firm has done, was conducted in early 2017 and gathered feedback from more than 300 in-house legal decision makers and labor and employment specialists. The respondents came from a variety of industries and more than half work at companies with over 1,000 employees.
Only 36 percent of respondents said that their departments met their L&E budgets in the last year. Some 26 percent spent more than expected and 14 percent spent less. Interestingly, the rest of respondents had no set budget for labor and employment.
Elise Bloom, co-chair of Proskauer's labor and employment department and co-head of its class and collective actions group, said in a press release announcing the report that in-house counsel working on employment matters for their companies are working to get the most out of their dollar as L&E challenges shift and evolve.
“With the focus on federal deregulation, there has been an increase at the state and local levels surrounding the scope of protections under the discrimination, leave and wage-and-hours laws,” said Bloom. “With the continuing pressure to do more with less, the survey provides information on how in-house lawyers are allocating intellectual and financial resources to manage labor and employment matters and increase the value added to their business partners and organizations.”
The survey indicated that companies are spending about one-eighth of their outside legal budget on L&E per year, an average of around $500,000. But spend varied across industries. Financial services, according to the survey, had the highest median spend per employee on labor and employment at $393 per head. At the low end was health care, with a median spend of $52 per employee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250