Why Legal and Financial Services Firms Get Stuck Paying Ransom to Hackers
As of late, ransomware has been making headlines again, most recently with the WannaCry malware. The computer code encrypts files on computers, making…
January 03, 2018 at 04:17 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As of late, ransomware has been making headlines again, most recently with the WannaCry malware. The computer code encrypts files on computers, making them inaccessible to the owners. Then, a sum of money, usually in the form of Bitcoin, is demanded by the attacker in exchange for being sent the key needed to decrypt the files.
The malware can infiltrate any type of device connected to the internet, including servers, desktop computers, laptops and smartphones. Most ransomware attacks go unreported because the victims don't want the public, and especially their clients, to know they were vulnerable. Instead, they pay up, shut up and hope it doesn't happen again. And that sensitivity makes law firms, with their stores of confidential information, especially juicy targets.
Adam Citron, senior cloud computing specialist at Nerdio, sat down with Inside Counsel for an exclusive interview. Citron has more than 16 years of experience in the IT industry in sales, marketing and management. At Nerdio, he puts his technical expertise and driven personality to work through his daily interactions with clients, ranging from operational staff to C-level executives.
Instead of paying out the ransom, the ideal solution is to prevent the attacks in the first place, per Citron, and that requires a multi-pronged approach to security which deals with all the various ways a hacker can gain access to systems. Today, big firms have the financial firepower and staffing manpower to create custom firewalls, virus detectors and other security tools. However, medium and small law firms simply don't have the money or time to adequately protect themselves using traditional methods.
Fortunately, a cost-effective security solution does exist: IT-as-a-Service, or ITaaS, which gives midsize and small law firms the same power and defenses as the big boys: prevention and updates, real-time monitoring, constant backups and even disaster recovery solutions. But, because an ITaaS provider is servicing many customers at the same time, law firms can take advantage of that economy of scale, getting top-end coverage at a reasonable rate.
“Preventing spam and malware is one of the first steps, and that means effective protection that is continually updated as new threats emerge,” he explained. “ITaaS watches a firm's emails, blocking dangerous messages before they arrive in a person's inbox. From the client side, the updates are behind the scene and automatic, saving time and money and allowing for desktop computers as well as servers to be scanned in real-time.”
Today, ransomware has been on the rise because it's such a lucrative business, according to Citron. When hackers hold an organization's servers or data hostage or threaten to publicly release sensitive information, the victims typically have no choice but to pay up. Ransomware has become an easy way for digital extortionists to make a lot of money, just by targeting and preying on the vulnerabilities of an organization's IT. And with stolen data also on the rise, the scope of ransomware has expanded even further.
“The general premise is that hackers use computer code to encrypt files and make them inaccessible to their owners,” he said. “The attackers then demand a sum of money–often in the form of Bitcoin–in exchange for a key to decrypt the files. Ransomware can infiltrate virtually any type of device connected to the Internet: servers, desktop computers, laptops, smartphones, you name it.”
Although ransomware seems to be making headlines these days, for every incident in the news, there are, in fact, many more attacks that go unreported. Most fly under the radar largely because the victim organizations don't want the public–and especially their clients–to know they were vulnerable. Instead, they pay up, shut up, and hope it doesn't happen again.
Amanda G. Ciccatelli is a Freelance Journalist for Corporate Counsel and InsideCounsel, where she covers intellectual property, legal technology, patent litigation, cybersecurity, innovation, and more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments’ Lack of Third-Party Oversight Leaving Small, Midsized Banks Exposed
4 minute readTen Best Practices to Protect Your Organization Against Cyber Threats
7 minute readSEC Fines 4 Companies $7M for Downplaying Breaches Tied to Massive SolarWinds Hack
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250