Linklaters drops NeXT for 'Rolls Royce' IT installation
Legal Week reports
January 21, 1999 at 10:31 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters is replacing its controversial NeXT document management system with a multi-million pound IT package which incorporates Documentum, the Internet-based document management system, Microsoft Office and Microsoft's Windows Terminal Server product.
Documentum, which is thought to have cost £1m alone, went live in Moscow last week. Linklaters expects to have it installed at all the firm's offices by the end of April.
Linklaters is believed to be the first law firm to install Documentum, although PricewaterhouseCoopers bought the system in November.
Simon Thompson, Linklaters' head of information and strategy, said his firm chose Documentum because it integrated well with the Web, was very secure and offered an open environment where new systems could be added easily.
"We believe it is the market leader in its field," Thompson said.
Eyebrows were raised at other City firms when Linklaters first installed NeXT in December 1994.
Many felt it was a bizarre choice
of IT package for a law firm because of its considerable cost and because it was so different from what everybody else in the market was doing.
Thompson said Linklaters was very happy with the NeXT system, but Documentum would offer greater scope for lawyers and clients to work closer together and share knowledge more easily.
Linklaters will eventually use Documentum to manage all of its document-based information, including know-how, practice management and its Blue Flag-type online services.
The firm is also rolling out Windows Terminal Server and making the switch to the Microsoft Office software package.
Windows Terminal Server, an add-on to Windows NT, enables Linklaters to centrally control its desktop PCs in a similar way to traditional mainframe systems.
This will allow the firm to reduce the cost of desktop computers by using 'thin clients' – desktop machines with much lower specifications than standard PCs.
"Everybody will have access to a standard set of applications," Thompson said. "Now Windows NT is viable, we can retain the benefits of centralised management we had with NeXT, but get the advantages of using Windows software.
We didn't want to introduce unmanaged PCs on a network."
As a result of the changes, Linklaters lawyers will now be using Microsoft Word as their word processing package, bringing them into line with most of their clients.
Freshfields IT director David Hamilton said: "It is nice to see Linklaters coming back towards the standard strategy that other firms have adopted.
Documentum is an interesting choice. It is a fine product, but it is questionable whether a law firm will be able to make use of all its advanced features. It's a Rolls Royce system."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250