By John Malpas
The final quarter of 1998 was not a good one for management buy-out (MBO) lawyers. John Penson, a buy-out specialist at Lovell White Durrant remembers one week when three deals he was working on collapsed – including the US venture capital house Kohlberg Kravis Roberts' (KKR) £1bn acquisition of paint supplier Herberts from German chemicals giant Hoechst.
Recent figures show that 1998 was a record year for the UK buy-out market. But there was a dramatic slump in the final quarter. Only 27 £10m-plus deals were struck during that period with a total value of £1.4bn, compared to 40 worth a total of £3.4bn during the preceding quarter.
"Turmoil in financial markets and mounting fears of recession killed off the appetite of all but a handful of banks for backing these transactions," says Mike Stevens, UK head of MBO services at KPMG Corporate Finance.
But things have started to change for the better in a remarkably short time. With the markets relatively settled after the round of US interest rate cuts and the successful launch of the euro, analysts are predicting renewed buy-out activity, especially on the Continent.
Earlier this month KKR confirmed plans to raise a multibillion dollar fund to target Europe. And this week it has emerged that 3iGroup, the UK's largest venture capital house, is negotiating the takeover of its main rival, Electra Investment Trust.
Both moves reflect the growing competition among US and UK equity houses to tap the European market – part of the rationale for the 3i move is Electra's strength on the Continent. Penson currently has 10 MBO deals on his books, which, he says, is pretty comparable to this time last year. He predicts the multimillion pound cross-border European deals that were a feature of the first half of 1998 will resurface this year.
Allen & Overy partner Susan Howard agrees. "The feeling is that the UK market is fairly mature and companies have gone down to their core businesses, whereas Europe is a few years behind the cycle and there is a lot of room for consolidation."
Hoechst is a case in point. At the same time as it unsuccessfully attempted to dispose of Herberts, it succeeded in selling its synthetic resins division Vianova Resins in a £250m deal.
Leading UK firms are well positioned to tap into this market – not just because they have been investing furiously in Europe, but also because the larger European buy-outs tend to be auctioned off in the City. But it is not all happening on the Continent. The UK market is also expected to recover reasonably quickly. As KPMG's Stevens points out, the large private equity houses have plenty of money to invest. And while that cash is stuck on deposit they are earning "ever declining rates of interest".
This predicament is persuading them to look more seriously at public-to-private transactions. In the past two years, public-to-private deals – where smaller quoted companies return to the private sector – have emerged as a new trend. So far there has been only a modest flow of such deals, but buy-out lawyers expect their number to increase as the market becomes more comfortable with them.
Chris Hale, at Travers Smith Braithwaite, has acted on several public-to-private transactions. He says the trend has been fuelled by a shift in the financial markets' structure which has led to investment being channelled into the larger listed companies at the expense of the smaller ones.
"The smaller companies are being neglected, making it more difficult for them to go to the market to raise capital, which is why they went public in the first place." Although public-to-privates are inherently more risky than standard management buy-outs, Hale expects a steady stream this year.
Ashurst Morris Crisp's Charlie Geffen agrees public-to-privates have a future "if they are structured in the right way". Like his competitors, he says it is pretty much business as usual at Ashursts' buy-out department. "Operations on the Continent and public-to-privates will continue," he reports. If the markets remain stable, and that is a big if, buy-out lawyers look set to have another good year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250