Schon Nolte in link-up as German firms focus on aggressive growth
Germany - Merger involving Linklaters' former suitor creates Germany's fourth-largest firm
January 27, 1999 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
By James Boxell
Linklaters' former German partner Schon Nolte is merging with national firm Gaedertz Rechtsanwalte to create the fourth-largest firm in Germany.
The two firms, which will operate under the name Gaedertz, said the merger was the first stage of an aggressive plan for international expansion.
The 55 lawyers, including 25 partners, from Schon Nolte's Hamburg, Frankfurt and Brussels offices, will join 130 lawyers at Gaedertz Rechtsanwalte, which has offices in Frankfurt, Berlin, Munich, Cologne, and Brussels.
The two firms are also about to merge with eight-lawyer Munich firm Ilert Berustort, which will give Gaedertz a total of 194 lawyers – including 88 partners.
Schon Nolte's Frankfurt lawyers this week moved in to Gaedertz Rechtsanwalte's offices in the city and are in the process of doing the same in Brussels.
The new firm will have 40 lawyers in Hamburg, Schon Nolte's main stronghold, making it the second-largest in the city, with an additional 23 lawyers in Berlin.
Schon Nolte's former Berlin partner firm Finkelnburg & Clemm – the two firms were collectively known as Schon Nolte Finkelnburg & Clemm – has not joined the new merger, opting instead to team its 25 lawyers with the rapidly growing Frankfurt and Hamburg firm Fedderson Laule Scherzberg & Ohle Hansen Ewerwahn.
Dr Christian Edye, a senior partner at Schon Nolte and a prime mover behind the merger, said his firm had decided to terminate its relationship with Finkelnburg & Clemm because it was "not happy" with the degree of integration between the two firms.
According to Edye, the main purpose of the Gaedertz Rechtsanwalte merger is to provide a solid platform for international expansion.
"The definitive reason, indeed the basis of the whole merger, is international," he said.
"We felt that our practice areas complemented each other well."
Schon Nolte mainly did mergers and acquisitions, corporate and commercial property work, with a substantial cross-border element.
Gaedertz has been more active domestically, involving itself in antitrust, IP, competition, new media and telecoms work. It is one of the leading IP and competition firms in Germany.
"The consolidation of both firms in Germany means we have the manpower and the whole range of practice areas needed to compete internationally," Edye added.
Edye said while his firm was not yet talking to any specific foreign firms, it was only interested in pursuing full international mergers. "We have no intention of going abroad on our own," he said.
"You cannot grow your own practice at a speed necessary to build up the expertise needed. We are also not interested in affiliations, we are only interested in allegiances whose stated aim is full merger."
According to Edye, Gaedertz was more likely to look to continental Europe before looking for a UK partner, although it definitely intended to enter the UK market sooner rather than later. "It is a question of taking the opportunities as they arise," he said.
Edye said the two firms settled on the Gaedertz name to provide a single brand name. "It is a symbol of our full integration," he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMilbank, Wachtell, Ropes and Pittsburgh Duo Aim to Save Nippon Steel's US Steel Merger
Kirkland, Macfarlanes Act as Evelyn Partners Offloads £700M Professional Services Arm
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250