C&I Group chair slams Law Society commitment to in-house sector
Law Society
February 03, 1999 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
The chairman of the Commerce & Industry (C&I) Group, Paul Gilbert, has lambasted the Law Society for failing to appreciate the importance of the in-house sector – and labelled the group's £12,600 annual grant as "pathetic".
Deriding the amount of the grant at the C&I Group annual dinner at the Savoy Hotel in London on Monday 1 February, Gilbert, head of legal at Cheltenham & Gloucester, said: "This isn't simply unfortunate. This isn't simply an oversight. This is crass stupidity." Gilbert warned the Law Society of the threat that in-house solicitors might give up their practising certificates.
"What the Law Society has to realise – and it must realise it quickly – is that if it is not prepared to support the sector appropriately, then the sector may look to support itself," he said.
In a wide-ranging speech, Gilbert stressed the pivotal role of the in-house sector, which now represents 10% of the profession.
"In-house lawyers are now the major purchasers of legal services in this country, placing millions of pounds into the pockets of solicitors in private practice up and down the land – big practice, small practice, high street, multi-national," he said.
Gilbert called on the Law Society to "take a lead on the work we do".
He said he was baffled by the profession's preoccupation with high street domestic conveyancing.
"If conveyancing was a product line, it would have been upgraded or discontinued years ago," he said.
"If it was a car, it would be a Trabant. If it was food, the sell-by date would make it a health risk."
A Law Society spokesman said Chancery Lane had firm commitment to the in-house sector. He added: "The Law Society has just given the C&I Group more than £20,000 for a specific consultancy project.
"We would look favourably on further requests for funding."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Another Partner Exits Deloitte Legal—Former M&A Head Joins UK Top 50 Law Firm
KPMG Law US Targets Alternative Business Licence, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 2New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 3Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 4To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
- 5Merchan Rejects Trump's Bid to Delay Manhattan Sentencing
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250