Davis Polk takes first steps towards Blue Flag-style US virtual law system
Online legal services
February 03, 1999 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
New York firm Davis Polk & Wardwell is emulating its transatlantic rivals Linklaters and Clifford Chance (CC) by building a virtual law capacity.
Spurred on by Linklaters' Blue Flag and CC's NextLaw online legal advice services, the firm has bought Jnana Technologies' Web-based knowledge system.
The Jnana system was previously used by in-house lawyers at General Electric to build a virtual patent adviser for its engineers, and more recently by technology and aerospace giant Rockwell's in-house lawyers to build a virtual invention disclosure adviser.
But the Davis Polk purchase is the first time the system has been introduced by a US law firm.
Michael Mills, director of professional services and systems at Davis Polk, said while his firm was still a long way from offering the level of advice seen in Linklaters' Blue Flag system, it was building systems for use by specific clients.
Mills said: "While we have developed some virtual systems, we have not focused them in the same way Blue Flag has done. I don't believe any US firm has and I think it is a year or two away, but it is a business model that intrigues me."
Davis Polk has developed a Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) adviser for use by its clients doing mergers and acquisitions work. The client follows a decision tree that determines whether an HSR application needs to be filed – when a merger has potential anti-trust implications – or whether face-to-face legal advice is needed. It automatically e-mails any results to the law firm.
Mills, an ex-Mayer Brown & Platt partner and leading light in the US legal technology community, said he was an "astute judge" of where the legal market was going. He said he believed Blue Flag-type systems would figure heavily in future in the US.
Mills said Jnana was an "extraordinary" application because lawyers building virtual advisers would not need programming skills, but could instead use simple drag and drop techniques to build the systems.
According to Mills, his firm's application of Jnana was more likely to spot issues than provide answers. "The system will come back and say 'the following 20 points need to be addressed'," he said.
Jnana project manager Ron Friedmann said: "Even when a Jnana application cannot answer the question definitively, the benefits are significant. Jnana performs an intelligent interview that collects all or most of the information a real lawyer would use to make the decision."
Friedmann said while he would "love" to see more US law firms developing virtual advice services, it was still far more likely for corporate law departments to embark on these initiatives. "The large UK firms are more committed to knowledge management than the large US firms," he said.
LA-headquartered Latham & Watkins – which has 750 lawyers working from eight other US offices as well as in London, Tokyo and Moscow – did develop a subscription-based virtual adviser for environmental information on international regulatory work.
But, according to business development director Jolene Overbeck, her firm dropped the application after finding it "didn't expand our market share".
"I don't think it was very effective as a practice tool, and maintenance took up valuable resources," Overbeck said. She added her firm is now developing a similar system for its health care practice. "It caters for the more routine parts of the process that clients have to go through. So far it has gone very well."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Another Partner Exits Deloitte Legal—Former M&A Head Joins UK Top 50 Law Firm
KPMG Law US Targets Alternative Business Licence, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 2California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 3New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 4Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 5To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250