View from the House
The Government's promotion of e-commerce is testimony to the growth of the medium. Lawyers must exploit the revolution or be left behind
February 11, 1999 at 03:49 AM
3 minute read
Once upon a time, IT, in the eyes of most lawyers, was something mostly handled by a shadowy individual who tapped a few keys and miraculously unlocked a computer screen – or not.
How times have changed. E-commerce is now a government watchword. The Lord Chancellor's Department (LCD) talks about divorce information disseminated via interactive screens, while implementation of civil justice reforms hinge not on the lawyers, but on new IT systems.
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have their own association – they met for lunch in the Commons last month. And even the venerable Commons Trade and Industry Select Committee is holding a high-profile inquiry on e-commerce.
If the Luddites among you remain unconvinced, then just take a look at New Labour's own policy priorities.
Stephen Byers, the new Secretary of State at the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), will soon announce the appointment of a new e-commerce supremo, who will co-ordinate the Government's bid to meet Tony Blair's target: a quarter of all government business to be conducted electronically by 2002.
E-commerce was on the agenda during US vice president Al Gore's recent whistle-stop at Downing Street. Even Gordon Brown and the Treasury are beginning to talk directly to IT manufacturers and telecoms companies.
This combination of government will and rapid technological development leads us to the inescapable fact that by 2005 the client-lawyer relationship will change significantly. This is already happening.
But technology will both hasten the change and place further demands on lawyers, particularly those at City firms.
UMTS, the third-generation mobile technology soon to come on-stream, will mean clients being able to conduct video conferences, receive and send e-mails, view presentations, surf the Web and access legal publications on screen – all from their laptops, or even from a mobile phone with a small screen.
The technology already exists. DSL technology – high speed voice and data access through existing phone lines – will make all the aforementioned services and more available on your home desktop or TV.
Clients will inevitably require access to legal services at their convenience, at any time of day or night and in whatever time-zone. And many of these services will be provided electronically.
This is not pie in the sky – we have almost reached the stage today when more data than voice calls are made over the telecommunications network.
We already face new, pioneering areas of legislation and of legal practice. Witness the Secure E-commerce Bill (due out in draft this year) and the e-commerce and copyright directives currently making their way through the EU legislative process.
Witness also the growth of departments in City firms dealing with Internet and IP/copyright.
Technology is here to stay. The trick for lawyers is to live with it and exploit it – or be defeated by it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTribunal Dismisses AML Case Against Kennedys’ Chief Risk Officer, But Ex-Partner Fined
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
2 minute readDLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250