Courtroom protest delays deal
Disgruntled shareholders protest at BTR-Siebe deal, Business Angels launch, and words of comfort for Clifford Chance
February 17, 1999 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers from Linklaters and Slaughter and May found themselves on the sidelines of a courtroom tussle last week as a scheme of arrangement hearing for the merger of engineering giants BTR and Siebe turned into a clash between some disgruntled shareholders and the judge.
Seven of about 100,000 shareholders objected to the merger on grounds of a technicality. But those in court claimed that the motive behind the action was the shareholders felt they were getting a bad deal out of the £7.6bn merger. The shareholders accused BTR of misusing proxy votes, but the court ruled against them on the grounds that the merger was a satisfactory deal.
The legal teams representing BTR and Siebe were split over their interpretation of the events. A source close to Siebe predicted such objections would become more frequent as well-informed shareholders become more active in defending their share in a company, however small that share is. But a lawyer from the BTR side was more cagey saying it "remained to be seen" whether the trend would develop. Both sides did agree, however, that the objection had put the deal back a few days and indeed, been a waste of time.
Angels could spread their wings
The government-led National Business Angels Network was launched last week with Reynolds Porter Chamberlain the only law firm among the sponsors.
The Network aims to bring together growth companies and high net worth individuals. RPC's Ron Norman said Business Angels "fulfil a vital function in supplying long-term equity finance for growth companies in amounts which are too small for conventional venture capital funds". This is true. Small high-tech companies in the UK have long suffered from a lack of interest by banks and existing venture capital funds – whether private or corporate – to provide early stage funding. And the network aims to bridge that gap.
But the experience of companies in Silicon Valley offers some lessons for the UK. Business Angels, who have made their money after leaving the likes of Microsoft, Cisco Systems and Sun Microsystems meet regularly to vet the latest business ideas.
Often they buy into an idea and, hey presto, here comes the next Geocities, (recently bought by Yahoo for £3.1bn). But Valley insiders report that discontent is growing as the power of Business Angels grows.
While investing is a business for traditional venture capitalists, the charge against Business Angels is that they treat their investments like a hobby. And unlike VC's they go on holiday. UK advisers to small high-tech companies – and lawyers play an important role here – need to be aware of the lessons from the US before delivering clients into the hands of Business Angels.
Mallesons' glowing report
The rationale behind Clifford Chance's interest in Australia's Mallesons Stephen Jaques (revealed in Legal Week) has had another boost. A survey by Corporate Adviser Securities Data puts Mallesons in the top spot for M&A – 114 deals worth a total of almost a$17bn.
This represents 38% of 1998′s deals. Clayton Utz, Freehill Hollingdale & Page and the Allens Arthur Robinson Group were all involved in about a third of 1998′s deals. Also note the importance of cross-border deals – 43% of all M&A deals were cross-border – to the large Australian firms. Even more reason, perhaps, to offer clients a one-stop international law service.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMilbank, Wachtell, Ropes and Pittsburgh Duo Aim to Save Nippon Steel's US Steel Merger
Kirkland, Macfarlanes Act as Evelyn Partners Offloads £700M Professional Services Arm
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250