Books: Defamation Law Procedure and Practice
Legal Week Reports
March 07, 2001 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Second Edition
Editor: David Price
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell
Price: £75
It is hardly surprising that the late, great, George Carman QC wrote a laudatory foreword to this useful book. Twenty years ago a defamation action attracted little media coverage unless one of the litigants was a well-known personality. Now, actions involving a comparatively unknown claimant receive a lot of coverage, which is an additional cause of pressure. David Price anticipates these areas of concern and provides tips on how to analyse and deal with them.
This book is helpful to lawyers and non-lawyers alike. One can imagine a newspaper editor having this book permanently in place on the working desk. It covers well the changes in law and procedure caused by the Defamation Act 1996, many of which were considerably delayed, the civil procedure rules and the Human Rights Act. Moreover the different positions of a claimant and defendant, particularly in the broadcast or written media, are well illustrated.
The book is separated into three parts: the Claimants; the Defendants; and the Remedies. The style of writing is comparatively light and not turgid. Explanations are clear and usually cater for any additional dimensions. Examples are given frequently, promoting easier assimilation.
A party in a difficult situation, whether claimant or defendant, or their lawyer, should be able to find at least part of the answer on law or procedure, if not the entire answer. Only a trial can resolve any conflict of evidence or fact. For example, the way in which a court might deal with a claimant who has a bad reputation, bringing an action for damages for defamation, and the conduct of the parties, always difficult areas, are clearly explained and illustrated.
In many cases, it might be better for a claimant to read the entire section on remedies before looking at the bringing of a claim.
For example, Chapter 23 General Considerations for Claimants deals with the fear of being involved in a combined poker game and war of nerves, with the possibility of republishing the defamation by publicity. Perhaps arising out of that very media coverage, claimants frequently overplay their hands. The author has shown how much he has absorbed over the years of the contrasting issues and dilemmas facing parties to such actions.
Qualified privilege is a complex area, and difficult for the inexperienced. To have three chapters on this subject, carefully categorised, is of great assistance, particularly after the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers.
Article 10 of the European Convention on the Right to Freedom of Expression, will undoubtedly make a considerable impact in our law, which the book helpfully anticipates.
Certain international aspects of defamation law are also addressed, and not just over internet issues. This is particularly apposite when London is often referred to as the 'libel capital of the world'.
Despite frequent criticism by the media and its lawyers that libel law in England and Wales is too restrictive and inhibits freedom of speech, the book is neutral on the subject. A media defendant would appreciate far more detailed information on the law and various precedents contained in the book, than confirmation of any opinion that it may hold which may be irrelevant to the success or not of an action.
As well as having the usual appendices of precedents/statutes, the Schedules of Defamation Trials and Appeals since 1990 and the Schedule of Personal Injury Awards for comparison purposes are particularly useful. For the non-lawyer or law student, the Glossary of Terms is extremely user-friendly.
The size of the book, compared to others for court purposes, is very helpful, combined with the price of £75 – particularly when considering practitioners' hourly rates.
Michael Gardner is a litigation partner in the City office of Morgan Cole.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readTrump Ordered to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days After Rejecting Costs Order
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Perkins Coie Hires Anthony Shannon as Chief People Officer
- 2Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 3Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 4Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 5Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250