Confidence breakers
Kerry Leggett reports on Ireland's longest libel case, which had a hearing of seven weeks
April 25, 2001 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
The conclusion of Beverley Cooper-Flynn v RTE, its chief reporter and a retired farmer have similarities to recent UK libel cases.
The fact that the plaintiff is a sitting member of the national parliament and the daughter of a former EU commissioner made sure the case was covered in the press daily.
RTE had reported that she had persuaded the named retired farmer and other un-named investors not to use a Tax Amnesty in 1993 but to invest the money through the Isle of Man bank where she worked.
The bank claimed confidentiality and its obligations to its customers superseded the defendants' claim to be given the names of those customers.
The court made an order providing discovery but with a proviso that the names and addresses or other identifying criteria would be masked. But in a judgment given by Mr Justice Kelly it was confirmed that the disclosure to the legal
representatives of the defendants would confer a litigious advantage on them so he ordered that the names and addresses of the bank's customers who had dealings with the plaintiff should be disclosed to the defendants' legal advisers.
This order enabled Collins to enquire about some 65 named customers and to interview many of them. Four of them were called to give evidence in the defamation proceedings taken by Beverley Cooper-Flynn.
These witnesses admitted that the money they were investing was undeclared income but they had been caught by the Inland Revenue and had to pay substantial arrears of tax, interest and penalties.
After a hearing of seven weeks, the jury found that while the defendants had failed to prove
that the retired farmer had been induced not to avail of the tax amnesty, some of the other witnesses had been so induced and accordingly awarded no damages to the plaintiff.
The legal costs have been estimated at more than £2m and costs were awarded against the plaintiff.
Kerry Leggett is a partner at Eugene F Collins.
Other defamation issues
Cyberspace
Defamation in cyberspace will open a huge area for the courts, in particular relating to who the publisher may be and also in what jurisdictions the injured party may sue.
ECHR
The constitution provides for protection of a person's good name. When the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights are incorporated into Irish law, it may cause conflict with this constitutional imperative and the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed in Article 10.
Law reform
The fact that a current member of the national parliament is facing a legal bill of about £2m by losing a defamation case may make governments reconsider defamation laws – some politicians have previously used them to their advantage.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden to Close in Shanghai and Make Cuts to China Corporate Practice
DWF Group's Canadian Firm Set to Add Fourth Office With 16-Lawyer Montreal Team
UK Law Firms Face £75M Money Laundering Investigations Alongside Russia Scrutiny
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250