Conveyancing gets dirty
big commercial firms are muscling in on the house-buying process. jane dudman says small firms can exploit technology to make sure they do not end up losing work
November 28, 2001 at 07:03 PM
7 minute read
A big battle is going on in the conveyancing market, as commercial firms use their technological might to wrestle market share away from smaller, local firms. But the game is not yet up for the high street firms: technology is giving them the means to combat their large rivals.
Electronic delivery of services is a major aim for many law firms. Conveyancing has led the field, in part because of the Government's drive to streamline the housebuying process. The most significant aspect of this has been the National Information Service (NLIS) search facility, which aims to provide online access to all the land and property information needed in the conveyancing process.
At the same time, large firms such as Hammond Suddards Edge, and Eversheds have been streamlining their own conveyancing services to make them cheaper, mainly by ensuring that most of the processes can be handled by paralegals rather than expensive lawyers.
"Electronic conveyancing is making a big impact," says Damian Griffiths, IT director of Addleshaws, which has been running its Enact online service for the past 16 months. "This is partly because a lot of things are coming together at the same time. Low interest rates mean that, even if people are not buying and selling, they are remortgaging and technically we now have the right systems and processes." This includes state-of-the-art web technology, backed up by a case management system written by Addleshaws' in-house IT team.
All this adds up to an onslaught on the high street
conveyancing business by a handful of big names. But Griffiths thinks high street firms, while under fire, need not despair. "High street firms will still win a lot of business," he says. "We have to compete to woo people away.
While all the major firms will steal market share, whether they will wrap up the market remains to be seen. There are still a lot of people who will go to the high street."
Hammonds Direct has been running an online
conveyancing service since spring 1998. Aimed at the big mortgage lenders, the service is part of a wider push towards direct service on the part of its owner, Hammond Suddards Edge. It handles about 5,000 completions a month, of which 80% is remortgage business.
"When we launched this, we would have wanted about 60% of the business to be remortgage and the rest to be made up of single purchases, particularly first-time buyers, but that is taking longer, mostly because the remortgage business has been so successful," says Achilles Hatjiosif, business development director at Hammonds Direct. "The key for large firms is putting the product infrastructure and people in place first, before designing the fancy online bits and the more digitisation in the back office, the better."
Like Griffiths, Hatjiosif thinks smaller firms, while under increasing pressure, will still have plenty of business. "We are not going to have 50% of the market or anything like that," he says. "We are aiming at low double figures for the four or five big firms providing online services. Smaller firms cannot afford the same kind of investment as the large firms, but they will benefit from the Government's moves, such as the NLIS, which will force them to improve their services."
Hatjiosif also thinks some high street firms will stay out of the technology race. "Some firms will not pick up on this and will continue traditional conveyancing, probably until the day I die," he says. "They provide value services and the local comfort factor."
Not all the technical pieces of the online conveyancing jigsaw are yet in place. The NLIS hub system, which is run through three commercial providers – MacDonald Dettwiler, Searchflow and TM Property Services – is only now going live. Only one-quarter of local authorities are hooked up to the hub electronically – a key part of speeding up searches. But take-up has been "encouraging", says Mark Riddick, chief executive officer of Searchflow. One potential concern in moving to online conveyancing is the security of documents, but Riddick says this should not deter anyone from using the service, pointing out the risks in sending documents by courier or allowing unsupervised cleaning staff into lawyers' offices.
TM Property Services, one of the other firms about to launch its NLIS service, is also developing a wider portfolio of online services. "NLIS is one bit, but there is a real challenge in streamlining
conveyancing," comments Richard Goodwin, business development director at the firm. "We have to improve communications and collaboration between all parties involved. There is other technology, such as online mapping and commercial information sources, which go into the realm of sellers' packs and the ability to find out all the necessary information upfront, not 10 weeks into the house-buying process."
It will not happen overnight. Opinions differ on how soon a critical mass of high street law firms will be hooked up to services such as NLIS. Some think it could take up to seven years; others believe the process will be much quicker, mainly as a result of pressure from lending providers. "One of the drivers to push this change forward could be a lender telling a law firm to use the system, because that is the way they do business," Goodwin says.
Steve Mason is senior partner at Mitcham-based Mason Collins, which is about to go live with the TM NLIS service. "All you need is an internet connection,"Mason points out. "There is no software involved." A scanner is needed to scan in plans where necessary, but the rest of the system is accessible via the TM website. "It does not cost anything in installation terms and you no longer need hard copy, you do not have to attach cheques and you do not have to post documents," says Mason. "Electronic conveyancing is the method of the future. The Land Registry is behind these moves and having this information online is the way forward."
Mason says there is still some way to go in providing a fully online service, but he is enthusiastic about the existing technology and its potential, particularly for smaller local firms. The system is geared to Land Registry basic searches, but the plan is to expand that and open the system to all parties, including estate agents and mortgage lenders, which will be able, via a password-protected system, to gain access to the transaction information.
Mason sees this as a step forward for small firms, enabling them to provide their clients with the same kind of service that the big firms provide, without the same kind of investment overhead. "Quite a lot of firms are installing their own systems, but it could be a waste of time. Once there is a public system via the TM site, which
is effectively free of change, small firms will be able to enjoy the benefits," he points out.
Electronic conveyancing: getting started
The Law Society has welcomed electronic conveyancing, which it describes as one of the most significant changes to affect conveyancing for the past 75 years. It has been involved in setting up the National Land Information Services (NLIS), which forms the cornerstone of the move towards full online conveyancing, and is running a series of seminars around the country to look at the impact of electronic conveyancing on solicitors and their clients.
One of the speakers at the seminars is Kenneth Byass, treasurer and chair of the Law Society's e-commerce working party, who is closely involved in the Law Society's working party on the Land Registration Bill and discussions with the Government on potential reforms of the home-buying process. "This road show is to tell solicitors that the system is there and they should use it, because ultimately it will be for their benefit and for the benefit of the public," says Byass.
The main message from the Law Society is that high street firms should start preparing now for electronic conveyancing. The main advice for high street firms is:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250