Dicksons memo signals merger U-turn
Legal Week reports
March 06, 2002 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Dickson Minto, widely regarded as the UK's most successful corporate finance boutique, is gearing up for a radical strategic u-turn as an internal document seen by Legal Week concedes that the firm cannot survive independently.
The 14-partner firm, which is best known for its respected private equity practice, is working on a plan to secure a formal European alliance as a precurser to a merger in the wake of a strategy review completed last September.
Dickson Minto is understood to be preparing to send partners on a meet-and-greet tour around Europe to open negotiations next month.
The European bid comes in the wake of the internal strategy review, in which the firm's managing partner, Alastair Dickson, states that the "status quo is not sustainable in the long term".
According to the report, a failure to secure a European network, will leave the firm with "the only credible long-term solution of merging with an English firm…which appears to have a future".
Dickson concludes a failure to come up with a credible plan would leave the firm, "milking the franchise, clearly possible in the short to medium term, but no longer than that", as the firm comes under pressure to provide more corporate support and international law.
The strategic u-turn at Dickson Minto, long regarded as a standard bearer for independent corporate firms, raises further questions about the future of the UK's dwindling band of successful niche corporate firms.
The future direction of Dickson Minto will be watched closely by international firms that are eager to acquire a respected UK firm, although the strategy document reports a "general antipathy among the partners for a link-up with a US firm".
The document makes it clear that the firm has largely discounted building up solely through organic growth, although the firm has also recognised that expertise in competition, employment, IP and IT is being demanded by transactional clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman's Former U.S. Co-Chair to Leave Partnership
- 2Hit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
- 3Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
- 4GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
- 5As Political Extremism Rises, Is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250