Norton Rose chooses iManage for document management overhaul
Hummingbird suffers blow as international firm opts for document management platform replacement
June 04, 2003 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
Norton Rose is set to switch document management platforms – from Hummingbird to iManage.
The 200-partner international firm has bought a site licence for iManage's full WorkSite product suite, comprising document management system and collaborative working applications, plus knowledge management, workflow and portal functionality.
The move comes as a blow to iManage's main competitor, Hummingbird, as Norton Rose was one of the largest UK-based users of Hummingbird's content management platform, having purchased the entire Enterprise suite of products, including Cyberdocs, DocsFusion, PowerDocs and Hummingbird EIP.
A December 2000 statement from the supplier states that its sale to Norton Rose "reinforces Hummingbird's global leadership in providing complete enterprise software solutions in the legal market".
A project insider said this time around Norton Rose chose not to run a formal selection process, instead adhering to its own well-defined strategy.
Norton Rose's IT department, headed by IT director Jeff Roberts, is now preparing for a global roll-out of WorkSite across the firm's network of 19 offices covering Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
It is understood the firm hopes to have completed the migration of its London headquarters by September.
Roberts' IT staff are already working on the project with a consulting team from Baker Robbins and Company.
Andrew Levison, head of Baker Robbins' UK technology consulting unit, said his company would be helping Norton Rose roll-out WorkSite across all offices.
Baker Robbins' global appointment as consultant to the project follows a commission last year to draw up a technology strategy for the firm, which was delivered in November.
According to an official statement on the move, Norton Rose based its decision on robustness of system architecture and matter-centric collaboration functionality.
Support for e-mail management applications was also a key criterion in Norton Rose's evaluation. This is perhaps unsurprising, given the recent e-mail scandal that engulfed the firm and featured in the national press after a fee earner forwarded a saucy personal e-mail to colleagues and friends who leaked it into the public domain.
At the time of writing, iManage's e-mail management module is still in development. But according to an official statement, Norton Rose is planning to buy the extra module as soon as it is released, to help fee earners better manage the e-mails and attachments that now constitute the majority of correspondence between clients and fee earners.
Geoff Hornsby, head of iManage's UK office, said: "In today's global marketplace, it is essential for international law firms such as Norton Rose to function as a coherent unit throughout their many offices worldwide."
However, the move also represents a significant turnaround for the law firm itself. One person involved in the project said that it was extremely rare for a large law firm to switch document management suppliers just two years after a major upgrade.
In an official press release, Jeff Roberts, IT director at Norton Rose, said WorkSite was a robust and fee earner friendly system.
He added that iManage "[has] an established customer base with similar firms to Norton Rose and demonstrated [that it] understand[s] the complex nature of our market".
Roberts declined to comment on the reasons for the decision to switch document management suppliers at this time.
Liz Maloney, UK country manager at Hummingbird, said: "Norton Rose is still a Hummingbird customer as they have our Legal Key system. They may have taken a decision on one product strategy direction, but this is fairly normal in the software industry. We hope to get them back on our environment in due course."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKennedys and Irwin Mitchell Replace Longstanding Leaders
Asia's Top Stories 2024: Departures, Layoffs and Breakups at the Likes of Kirkland, Skadden and Mayer Brown
Hogan Lovells M&A Partner Returns to Baker McKenzie Ahead Australia Exit
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250