Slaughter and May wins out as most respected magic circle firm
Senior lawyers vote conservative London firm as most respected and best managed magic circle member
June 22, 2005 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
UK partners have overwhelmingly voted Slaughter and May as the most respected and best managed magic circle law firm, according to the latest poll of senior lawyers.
The famously conservative London firm was ranked significantly higher than its magic circle rivals in this week's Legal Week/ EJ Legal Big Question survey, in which almost half (49%) of the panel of more than 100 leading lawyers labelled Slaughters as the most admired magic circle firm.
The result places Slaughters comfortably ahead of Allen & Overy (A&O) and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, which both achieved 16% of the vote.
Forty-three percent of lawyers also viewed Slaughters as the best managed of the five firms, ahead of Freshfields, which came second with 27%. Clifford Chance (CC) came last with just 2%, following a turbulent couple of years in which its US practice has seen office closures and numerous partner departures.
Slaughters' practice partner David Frank said: "It goes to show that although we do not follow fashion, people increasingly view our strategy as credible. We are a traditional partnership, which makes it slightly easier to manage compared with other firms that are not."
The results are in stark contrast with this time last year when the same question was put to UK partners and Freshfields and A&O were dubbed the best-managed firms.
Slaughters' popularity did not extend across the board, however. When asked which firm has made the most progress over the past five years, 39% opted for Freshfields, with 28% naming Linklaters and just 7% voting for Slaughters.
When asked which firm partners would invest their life savings in, if it were possible to buy shares in a law firm, 46% said they would invest in Slaughters, while Linklaters and Freshfields each received 18% of the vote and just 2% chose CC.
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy corporate partner Tim Emmerson said: "It would have to be Slaughters because it is better, safer and you get more quality per person there than anywhere else. Every magic circle partner secretly wants to be a partner at Slaughters."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readTrump Ordered to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days After Rejecting Costs Order
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Perkins Coie Hires Anthony Shannon as Chief People Officer
- 2Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 3Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 4Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 5Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250