Senior litigators say civil justice reforms are under-funded
A panel of senior litigators and litigation experts put together by LexisNexis, the legal publisher, has criticised the lack of government investment in civil justice reforms.
July 24, 2005 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
The panel, which met for a round-table discussion on the UK's civil procedure rules this month, issued the following statement: "The lack of government investment, in particular in online legal facilities, [has] directly impacted on the efficient management of civil cases. Without suitable case management resources, the preparation of legal documents becomes time consuming, which in turn forces up costs."
Panel members included the Right Honourable Lord Justice Brooke; Christopher Floyd QC; Keith Conway from Dechert LLP; Simon Davis from Clifford Chance; David Redfern from Stanley Tee and Fraser Whitehead from Russell, Jones & Walker.
David Redfern, managing partner of regional firm Stanley Tee, said there was a general need to increase efficiency throughout the UK's civil court system.
He said: "The profession has overtaken the courts on the IT front. We operate in a highly technical way and then hit the buffers of the courts. If courts had an effective case management system and email we could make real progress."
Fraser Whitehead, a litigation partner at London firm Russell Jones & Walker, said: "I don't think there is any will power in the treasury to fund the civil justice system because it is viewed as essentially private dispute resolution that should only be funded as a last resort."
He added: "I think in the future we will therefore see a move towards alternative processes to resolve disputes and a greater non-lawyer involvement in the process."
Bill Marshall, publishing systems director at LexisNexis Butterworths, said: "When the issue of cost jeopardises or interferes with the pursuit of justice and the efficiency of case management systems is questioned, steps need to be taken to bring about change."
He added: "Online facilities can play an imperative role in increasing efficiency and in turn reducing the time spent preparing for cases, a direct knock-on effect of which is reduced cost."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden to Close in Shanghai and Make Cuts to China Corporate Practice
DWF Group's Canadian Firm Set to Add Fourth Office With 16-Lawyer Montreal Team
UK Law Firms Face £75M Money Laundering Investigations Alongside Russia Scrutiny
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250