Charles Russell pursues unpaid fees claim
Legal Week Reports
February 01, 2006 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Charles Russell is suing a man listed as living in a mobile home for unpaid legal fees stemming from a divorce case. The firm has issued a claim through Stephenson Harwood against Alistair Currey for 'unpaid' fees amounting to nearly £100,000.
The claim form, issued in the High Court in September last year, alleges that Charles Russell issued Currey with three bills for legal services between 9 November, 2004, and 7 February, 2005, amounting to a total of £96,181.46, and that they remain unpaid.
In addition to suing for the unpaid bills, Charles Russell is also claiming interest of 12% per year on the outstanding amount – totalling £8,491.72 – as well as a court fee of £900 and solicitors' costs of £110, bringing the total cost of the claim to £105,683.
The fees stem from a 2004 Court of Appeal case relating to Currey's divorce proceedings which began in 2001, and involved substantial property assets and inherited wealth.
The case was originally handled by Stephenson Harwood, but transferred to Charles Russell when the firm took on its family team in 2004.
Commercial litigation partner Kenneth Duncan at Stephenson Harwood submitted the claim for unpaid fees.
One matrimonial partner at a London law firm told Legal Week: "It is always safest to organise payment as you go along, or to facilitate a bank loan. It is never a good idea to work without any cover, as it often ensures unpleasantness on the day."
Neither Stephenson Harwood nor Charles Russell would make any comment, as legal proceedings are still ongoing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPartners from Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper and PwC Join New Firms in Australia
4 minute readIndia Firm Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as UK and US Firms Race for Market Share
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250