Pride and prejudice
Lack of pretension brings its own rewards
May 10, 2006 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
Hard on the heels of Halliwells' takeover of Manchester insurance stalwart James Chapman & Co comes another important northwest merger – this time from the other side of the tracks.
Irwin Mitchell has snapped up the claimant boutique Alexander Harris. In the field of personal injury, this is a top-level transaction. Despite the loss of some key partners in recent years, Alexander Harris remains a highlyrated clinical negligence outfit.
The similarity between the Halliwells and Irwin Mitchell deals goes beyond geography. Just as James Chapman was struggling to survive on its own in the cut-throat world of defendant insurance, eight-partner Alexander Harris, too, was evidently facing the squeeze. Irwin Mitchell's stellar profitability – at least when measured by average profits per equity partner – is testament to the fact that, if managed efficiently, claimant work can be highly profitable. Scale is a crucial part of this equation – not just for low-value bulk work, but also for high-value cases.
Clinical negligence cases can drag on and are difficult to prove. The rewards can be high if you win, but smaller firms risk becoming dependent on a handful of cases, exposing them to cash-flow and risk management problems. All of which, say senior personal injury lawyers, makes the logic of the Alexander Harris/Irwin Mitchell deal compelling.
The Legal Week top 50 survey contains just two firms with large claimant practices: Irwin Mitchell and Shoosmiths. Both have performed well in recent years. Irwin Mitchell's average profits per equity partner for 2004-05 of £490,000 put most national firms in the shade and not a few leading London practices. Shoosmiths – a Legal Week 'firm to watch' in last year's analysis – was the fastestgrowing top 50 firm by profits in 2004 and 2005.
The pair's unpretentious approach to legal business is epitomised by Shoosmiths' view when reviewing its bulk practices. Far from being embarrassed about this work, partners argued that the commercial nous required to produce the legal equivalent of widgets actually brought it closer to many of its business clients. With the Clementiinspired legal services reforms and the Carter review of criminal legal aid promising to transform so-called high street practice, expect the Legal Week top 50 to become more, not less, diverse.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Threat of Trump Tariffs Is Sign Canada Needs to Wean Off Reliance on Trade with U.S., Trade Lawyers Say
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
- 2Fellows LaBriola LLP is Pleased to Announce that Alisha Goel Has Become Associated with The Firm
- 3Law Firms Turn to 'Golden Handcuffs' to Rein In Partner Movement
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250