Commentary: Shearman still credible but no longer dangerous
Can a fairer wind from Manhattan silence claims of woe dogging Shearman in the UK?
September 06, 2006 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
The City rumour mill just won't leave Shearman & Sterling's London arm alone, with claims once against flying around that the practice has lost both its direction and the favour of head office.
While much of the City has enjoyed the current surge in M&A activity, the London office has struggled to make an impact after losing two high-profile M&A partners to US rivals within nine months. The departure of Adrian Knight to Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in December was put down to a lack of integration with Shearman's wider practice. But the recent move of Jonathan Coppin to Hogan & Hartson is harder to spin, since Coppin had been billed as a central component of Shearman's European corporate practice. Now a firm that wanted to have at least five UK M&A partners has just two.
As one partner at a magic circle firm comments: "Shearman's London office is successful and it is definitely credible, but strategically, it is not threatening. A few years ago it was a threat."
Few are blaming longstanding managing partner Kenneth MacRitchie, who is credited with building the market-leading position the office enjoyed for so long. But while respected by partners, some would argue MacRitchie's no-fuss style has not helped deal with a reputation for poor associate morale. The problem was acknowledged in the firm's decision to be one of the first in London to bump up salaries for UK lawyers when in April it agreed a 20% pay hike. But it still has a poor record for making up UK partners.
The attempts to build out its practice have also been slow. Ex-Ashurst heavyweight Ian Nisse remains the sole real estate partner and Shearman has been looking for litigation partners since the departure of Chris Colbridge to Kirkland & Ellis last year – leaving arbitration partner David Reed, who transferred from Paris, to fill the gap.
The more established finance practice appears on stronger ground, having shipped in Allen & Overy's Julian Tucker last year to lead its structured finance push while home-grown Patrick Clancy made partner late last year.
Rivals have long speculated over the intentions of leveraged finance partner Anthony Ward, but Shearman remains confident that Ward, who recently took a place on the firm's main policy committee, will keep the faith. The firm remains a serious player in projects.
None of which will be sufficient to get Shearman on the front foot without its corporate practice stepping up several gears. With ex-Linklaters man Peter King and this year's recruitment of Norton Rose partner Laurence Levy, Shearman has polished technical lawyers. What it lacks – in particular since the departure of Knight – are at-the-coalface deal partners and natural business winners.
The firm is, as ever in recent years, hunting for hires, but with Shearman's profits lagging behind those of Wall Street rivals, recruitment has become tougher. At the same time, an unsettled period for Shearman's New York practice has not helped the firm to plan. Yet if New York has contributed to the malaise, it seems the firm's notoriously cyclical US practice also presents the most realistic chance of turning the ship around. Even critics concede that the US practice is on course for a much-improved 2006 on the back of a series of big-ticket instructions. And after all, there is nothing like money to silence the gossips.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan AI Beat the Billable Hour? Legal Tech Firms Say Selling AI Products to Law Firms Still a Challenge
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250